Abstract:PurposeThe massive amount of available information and functionality of the Internet makes selective information seeking effortless. This paper aims to understand the selective exposure to information during a health decision-making task.Design/methodology/approachThis study conducted an experiment with a sample of 36 students to examine the influence of prior attitude, perceived threat level and information limit on users’ selective exposure to and recall of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination information. Participants were assigned to two conditions with or without an upper limit of the number of articles to be examined, and this study collected the number of articles read, the number of articles included in the report and recall score of the articles after one day of the experiment.FindingsThis study found that (1) participants with a negative attitude were more inclined to view attitude-consistent information and recalled attitude-consistent information more accurately, while participants with a positive attitude viewed more balanced information; (2) participants perceiving higher health threat level recalled attitude-consistent information more accurately; and (3) an upper limit on the number of articles to be viewed does not have any impact on selective exposure.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings of this paper pinpoint the disparity of influence of positive and negative attitudes on selective exposure to and selective recall of health information, which was not previously recognized.Practical implicationsVaccination campaigns should focus on reaching people with negative attitudes who are more prone to selective exposure to encourage them to seek more balanced information.Originality/valueThis is the first paper to explore selective exposure to COVID-19 vaccination information. This study found that people with a negative attitude and a higher level of perceived health threat are more prone to selective exposure, which was not found in previous research.

The Negative Relationship Between Threats and Endorsement of Freedom

Risk Perception, Mental Health Distress, and Flourishing During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China: the Role of Positive and Negative Affect

Psychological Reactance Theory and COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates: The Roles of Threat Magnitude and Direction of Threat

Extremism, knowledge, and overconfidence in the covid-19 restriction times

Authoritarianism, perceptions of security threats, and the COVID-19 pandemic: A new perspective

Effects of COVID-19 related economic threat on political conservatism, xenophobia, and racial bias in the United States

Extending psychological reactance theory to include denial of threat and media sharing intentions as freedom restoration behavior

Trust in Government Actions During the COVID-19 Crisis

Trust is good, control is better: The role of trust and personal control in response to threat

The Impact of Interpersonal Risk Communication on People’s Cognitive Risk Perception and Negative Emotions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mediation and Moderation Model

Democratic and Authoritarian Government Preferences in Times of Crisis

Political Affiliation Moderates the Effect of Injunctive Norms on Freedom Threat and Behavioral Intentions: Limiting Indoor Gatherings to Flatten the COVID-19 Curve

Double Standards in the COVID-19 Pandemic: the Moderation of Perceived Threat

From anxiety to action—Experience of threat, emotional states, reactance, and action preferences in the early days of COVID-19 self-isolation in Germany and Austria

Does COVID-19 threat increase xenophobia? The roles of protection efficacy and support seeking

Negative Emotion Arousal and Altruism Promoting of Online Public Stigmatization on COVID-19 Pandemic

The unique roles of threat perception and misinformation accuracy judgments in the relationship between political orientation and COVID‐19 health behaviors

The Effects of Perceived Threat and Efficacy on College Students’ Social Distancing Behavior during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Selective Exposure to COVID-19 Vaccination Information: the Influence of Prior Attitude, Perceived Threat Level and Information Limit

Alluring or Alarming? The Polarizing Effect of Forbidden Knowledge in Political Discourse

Is Nationalism Rising in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic? Individual-Level Evidence from the United States