Abstract:Various branches of the literature suggest that exposure to the high-status appearances and lifestyles of politicians in contemporary "diploma democracies" affects the attitudes and behavior of less-educated citizens because it confronts them with their lower status in the political domain. Informed by this, we theorize that such exposure inspires docility (a lower subjective social status, weaker feelings of political entitlement) and revolt (anger, more support for aggression against government). To investigate this, we conducted an original, pre-registered, video-vignette survey experiment among a representative sample of the Dutch population. While our findings likely generalize to other liberal democracies, the Dutch context is suitable to test our theorizing because low-status and high-status appearances and lifestyles are found across the political arena, irrespective of politicians' substantive positions or use of populist rhetoric. Each less-educated respondent (n = 1390) was presented with a professionally produced video of an actor playing the part of a fictitious politician. This politician signaled either a low or a high status via his appearance and lifestyle. The potentially confounding factors of his substantive positions and populist rhetoric were randomized and controlled for. We find that exposure to the high-status politician increased less-educated citizens' support for aggression against the government. Through exploratory analyses, we assess how the responses of docility and revolt are interrelated, and how they are shaped by less-educated citizens' economic status.

Democratic and Authoritarian Government Preferences in Times of Crisis

Rejection of the status quo: Conspiracy theories and preference for alternative political systems

Anti-establishment sentiments: realistic and symbolic threat appraisals predict populist attitudes and conspiracy mentality

Political conservatism, authoritarianism, and societal threat: voting for Republican representatives in U.S. Congressional elections from 1946 to 1992

Social and political trust diverge during a crisis

Trust in Government Actions During the COVID-19 Crisis

Authoritarianism, perceptions of security threats, and the COVID-19 pandemic: A new perspective

The Negative Relationship Between Threats and Endorsement of Freedom

Testing Theories of Threat, Individual Difference, and Ideology: Little Evidence of Personality-Based Individual Differences in Ideological Responses to Threat

Belief, motivational, and ideological correlates of human rights attitudes

Trust is good, control is better: The role of trust and personal control in response to threat

Not "My" crisis: Social identity and followers' crisis responses to COVID-19

Trust and accountability in times of crisis

Radical Distrust: Are Economic Policy Attitudes Tempered by Social Trust?

Does threat trigger prosociality? The relation between basic individual values, threat appraisals, and prosocial helping intentions during the COVID-19 pandemic

Politicians' high-status signals make less-educated citizens more supportive of aggression against government: A video-vignette survey experiment

Government Trust, Social Trust, and Citizens’ Risk Concerns: Evidence from Crisis Management in China

From anxiety to action—Experience of threat, emotional states, reactance, and action preferences in the early days of COVID-19 self-isolation in Germany and Austria

Need for cognitive closure and desire for cultural tightness mediate the effect of concern about ecological threats on the need for strong leadership

Effects of COVID-19 related economic threat on political conservatism, xenophobia, and racial bias in the United States

Liberal-conservative asymmetries in anti-democratic tendencies are partly explained by psychological differences in a nationally representative U.S. sample