Tale of Three Phosphate Additives for Stabilizing NCM811/Graphite Pouch Cells: Significance of Molecular Structure–Reactivity in Dictating Interphases and Cell Performance

Huajun Zhao,Yunxian Qian,Shiguang Hu,Guangfu Luo,Chenxi Nie,Peiqi Qiu,Yuanyuan Kang,Han Wang,Yanli Chu,Qingrong Wang,Jun Wang,Huaiyu Shao,Kang Xu,Yonghong Deng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c06890

2021-06-17

Abstract:Electrolyte additives have been extensively used as an economical approach to improve Li-ion battery (LIB) performances; however, their selection has been conducted on an Edisonian trial-and-error basis, with little knowledge about the relationship between their molecular structure and reactivity as well as the electrochemical performance. In this work, a series of phosphate additives with systematic structural variation were introduced with the purpose of revealing the significance of additive structure in building a robust interphase and electrochemical property in LIBs. By comparing the interphases formed by tripropyl phosphate (TPPC1), triallyl phosphate (TPPC2), and tripropargyl phosphate (TPPC3) containing alkane, alkene, and alkyne functionalities, respectively, theoretical calculations and comprehensive characterizations reveal that TPPC3 and TPPC2 exhibit more reactivity than TPPC1, and both can preferentially decompose both reductively and oxidatively, forming dense and protective interphases on both the cathode and anode, but they lead to different long-term cycling behaviors at 55 °C. We herein correlate the electrochemical performance of the high energy Li-ion cells to the molecular structure of these additives, and it is found that the effectiveness of TPPC1, TPPC2, and TPPC3 in preventing gas generation, suppressing interfacial resistance growth, and improving cycling stability can be described as TPPC3 &gt; TPPC2 &gt; TPPC1, i.e., the most unsaturated additive TPPC3 is the most effective additive among them. The established correlation between structure–reactivity and interphase-performance will doubtlessly construct the principle foundation for the rational design of new electrolyte components for future battery chemistry.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acsami.1c06890?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.1c06890</a>.Figure S1, the overall performance of NCM811/AG pouch cells with various electrolytes; Figure S2, XPS characterization of the pristine NCM811; Figure S3, XPS characterization (a–d) of the pristine AG; Figure S4, XPS characterization (a–d) of the NCM811 cathode after 500 cycles; Figure S5, XPS characterization of the aged AG anode after 500 cycles; Figure S6, SEM images of the pristine NCM811; Figure S7, SEM images of the pristine AG; Figure S8, TEM images of the pristine NCM811 (a) and AG (b); Figure S9, LC–MS chromatograms collected from the electrolytes after formation within the retention time of 1–7 min (a) and 7–11 min (b); Scheme S1, possible formation mechanism of oligo-phosphate (C₁₀H₂₄O₈P₂); Scheme S2, possible formation mechanism of phosphate carbonate (C₁₃H₂₈O₁₁P₂); Scheme S3, possible formation mechanism of ether carbonate copolymers (C₁₃H₂₂O₁₀); Scheme S4, an overview of oligo-phosphate, phosphate carbonate, and ether carbonate copolymers; Table S1, atomic concentration (%) of the surface layer on NMC811 after formation; Table S2, atomic concentration (%) of the surface layer on NMC811 electrodes after 500 cycles; Table S3, atomic concentration (%) of the surface layer on AG anodes after formation cycles; Table S4, atomic concentration (%) of the surface layer on AG anodes after 500 cycles; Table S5, LC–QTof–MS of the electrolyte after 500 cycles; Table S6, LC–QTof–MS of the NCM811 cathode after 500 cycles; Table S7, LC–QTof–MS of the AG anode after 500 cycles (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsami.1c06890/suppl_file/am1c06890_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

materials science, multidisciplinary,nanoscience & nanotechnology