Abstract:This review surveys physiological, behavioral, and morphological evidence converging to the view of the cerebro-cerebellum as loci of internal forward models. The cerebro-cerebellum, the phylogenetically newest expansion in the cerebellum, receives convergent inputs from cortical, subcortical, and spinal sources, and is thought to perform the predictive computation for both motor control, motor learning, and cognitive functions. This predictive computation is known as an internal forward model. First, we elucidate the theoretical foundations of an internal forward model and its role in motor control and motor learning within the framework of the optimal feedback control model. Then, we discuss a neural mechanism that generates various patterns of outputs from the cerebro-cerebellum. Three lines of supporting evidence for the internal-forward-model hypothesis are presented in detail. First, we provide physiological evidence that the cerebellar outputs (activities of dentate nucleus cells) are predictive for the cerebellar inputs [activities of mossy fibers (MFs)]. Second, we provide behavioral evidence that a component of movement kinematics is predictive for target motion in control subjects but lags behind a target motion in patients with cerebellar ataxia. Third, we provide morphological evidence that the cerebellar cortex and the dentate nucleus receive separate MF projections, a prerequisite for optimal estimation. Finally, we speculate that the predictive computation in the cerebro-cerebellum could be deployed to not only motor control but also to non-motor, cognitive functions. This review concludes that the predictive computation of the internal forward model is the unifying algorithmic principle for understanding diverse functions played by the cerebro-cerebellum.

Motor imagery, forward models and the cerebellum: a commentary on Rieger et al., 2023

A theoretical perspective on action consequences in action imagery: internal prediction as an essential mechanism to detect errors: a commentary on Rieger et al. 2023

When does imagery require motor resources? A commentary on Bach et al., 2022

Picture this! Suggested instructions for guiding the Neuroscience of action imagery: A commentary on Krüger et al. (2022)

Towards Enhancing Motor Imagery Based Brain-Computer Interface Performance By Integrating Speed Of Imagined Movement

Towards formal models of inhibitory mechanisms involved in motor imagery: a commentary on Bach et al. (2022)

Does Motor Simulation Theory Explain the Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying Motor Imagery? A Critical Review

Imagined and Executed Actions in the Human Motor System: Testing Neural Similarity Between Execution and Imagery of Actions with a Multivariate Approach

Motor Imagery Enhances Performance Beyond the Imagined Action

Reading motor intention through mental imagery

Motor imagery and direct brain-computer communication

Neuromuscular effects suggest that imagery engages motor components directly – a commentary on Frank et al. (2023)

Commentary on Frank et al., (2003): where does learning through motor imagery lie on the perceptual-motor continuum?

Imagery practice of motor skills without conscious awareness?: a commentary to Frank et al.

The complex interplay between perception, cognition, and action: a commentary on Bach et al. 2022

The neural network of motor imagery: An ALE meta-analysis

Learning via imagery – merging techniques to improve the outcomes: a commentary on Frank et al. (2023)

Decoding motor imagery from the posterior parietal cortex of a tetraplegic human

Learning motor actions via imagery—perceptual or motor learning?

The Cerebro-Cerebellum as a Locus of Forward Model: A Review

Bayesian model of individual learning to control a motor imagery BCI