Abstract:Abstract Large-size mandible graft has huge needs in clinic caused by infection, tumor, congenital deformity, bone trauma and so on. However, the reconstruction of large-size mandible defect is challenged due to its complex anatomical structure and large-range bone injury. The design and fabrication of porous implants with large segments and specific shapes matching the native mandible remain a considerable challenge. Herein, the 6% Mg-doped calcium silicate (CSi-Mg6) and β- and α-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP, α-TCP) bioceramics were fabricated by digital light processing as the porous scaffolds of over 50% in porosity, while the titanium mesh was fabricated by selective laser melting. The mechanical tests showed that the initial flexible/compressive resistance of CSi-Mg6 scaffolds was markedly higher than that of β-TCP and α-TCP scaffolds. Cell experiments showed that these materials all had good biocompatibility, while CSi-Mg6 significantly promoted cell proliferation. In the rabbit critically sized mandible bone defects (∼13 mm in length) filled with porous bioceramic scaffolds, the titanium meshes and titanium nails were acted as fixation and load bearing. The results showed that the defects were kept during the observation period in the blank (control) group; in contrast, the osteogenic capability was significantly enhanced in the CSi-Mg6 and α-TCP groups in comparison with the β-TCP group, and these two groups not only had significantly increased new bone formation but also had thicker trabecular and smaller trabecular spacing. Besides, the CSi-Mg6 and α-TCP groups showed appreciable material biodegradation in the later stage (from 8 to 12 weeks) in comparison with the β-TCP scaffolds while the CSi-Mg6 group showed much outstanding mechanical capacity in vivo in the early stage compared to the β-TCP and α-TCP groups. Totally, these findings suggest that the combination of customized strength-strong bioactive CSi-Mg6 scaffolds together with titanium meshes is a promising way for repairing the large-size load-bearing mandible defects.

[Biomaterials for bone defect repair and bone regeneration].

[Advances in Molecular Regulatory Mechanisms of Jaw Repair and Reconstruction]

Advanced biomaterials for repairing and reconstruction of mandibular defects

Biomaterials for bone defect repair: Types, mechanisms and effects

Recent Trends in the Development of Bone Regenerative Biomaterials

Biomaterial scaffolds in maxillofacial bone tissue engineering: A review of recent advances

Biomaterials for craniofacial bone engineering

A review of biomimetic scaffolds for bone regeneration: Toward a cell‐free strategy

Recent Advances in Biomaterials for the Treatment of Bone Defects

Scaffold Guided Bone Regeneration for the Treatment of Large Segmental Defects in Long Bones

Customized bioceramic scaffolds and metal meshes for challenging large-size mandibular bone defect regeneration and repair

Recent advances in biofunctional guided bone regeneration materials for repairing defective alveolar and maxillofacial bone: A review

Advances in biomaterials for oral-maxillofacial bone regeneration: spotlight on periodontal and alveolar bone strategies

GelMA-based bioactive hydrogel scaffolds with multiple bone defect repair functions: therapeutic strategies and recent advances

Bone regeneration: Biomaterials as local delivery systems with improved osteoinductive properties

Structure-optimized and microenvironment-inspired nanocomposite biomaterials in bone tissue engineering

Biomaterials for Bone Grafting and Craniofacial Bone Regeneration

Advancing application of mesenchymal stem cell-based bone tissue regeneration

Biomaterial scaffolds regulate macrophage activity to accelerate bone regeneration

Stem Cell-Friendly Scaffold Biomaterials: Applications for Bone Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine