Abstract:Background: Bone defects after trauma, infection, or tumour resection present a challenge for patients and clinicians. To date, autologous bone graft (ABG) is the gold standard for bone regeneration. To address the limitations of ABG such as limited harvest volume as well as overly fast remodelling and resorption, a new treatment strategy of scaffold-guided bone regeneration (SGBR) was developed. In a well-characterized sheep model of large to extra-large tibial segmental defects, three-dimensional (3D) printed composite scaffolds have shown clinically relevant biocompatibility and osteoconductive capacity in SGBR strategies. Here, we report four challenging clinical cases with large complex posttraumatic long bone defects using patient-specific SGBR as a successful treatment. Methods: After giving informed consent computed tomography (CT) images were used to design patient-specific biodegradable medical-grade polycaprolactone-tricalcium phosphate (mPCL-TCP, 80:20 wt%) scaffolds. The CT scans were segmented using Materialise Mimics to produce a defect model and the scaffold parts were designed with Autodesk Meshmixer. Scaffold prototypes were 3D-printed to validate robust clinical handling and bone defect fit. The final scaffold design was additively manufactured under Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines for patient-specific and custom-made implants by Osteopore International Pte Ltd. Results: Four patients (age: 23-42 years) with posttraumatic lower extremity large long bone defects (case 1: 4 cm distal femur, case 2: 10 cm tibia shaft, case 3: complex malunion femur, case 4: irregularly shaped defect distal tibia) are presented. After giving informed consent, the patients were treated surgically by implanting a custom-made mPCL-TCP scaffold loaded with ABG (case 2: additional application of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2) harvested with the Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator system (RIA, Synthes®). In all cases, the scaffolds matched the actual anatomical defect well and no perioperative adverse events were observed. Cases 1, 3 and 4 showed evidence of bony ingrowth into the large honeycomb pores (pores >2 mm) and fully interconnected scaffold architecture with indicative osseous bridges at the bony ends on the last radiographic follow-up (8-9 months after implantation). Comprehensive bone regeneration and full weight bearing were achieved in case 2 at follow-up 23 months after implantation. Conclusion: This study shows the bench to bedside translation of guided bone regeneration principles into scaffold-based bone tissue engineering. The scaffold design in SGBR should have a tissue-specific morphological signature which stimulates and directs the stages from the initial host response towards the full regeneration. Thereby, the scaffolds provide a physical niche with morphology and biomaterial properties that allow cell migration, proliferation, and formation of vascularized tissue in the first one to two months, followed by functional bone formation and the capacity for physiological bone remodelling. Great design flexibility of composite scaffolds to support the one to three-year bone regeneration was observed in four patients with complex long bone defects. The translational potential of this article: This study reports on the clinical efficacy of SGBR in the treatment of long bone defects. Moreover, it presents a comprehensive narrative of the rationale of this technology, highlighting its potential for bone regeneration treatment regimens in patients with any type of large and complex osseous defects.

Scaffold Guided Bone Regeneration for the Treatment of Large Segmental Defects in Long Bones

The Concept of Scaffold-Guided Bone Regeneration for the Treatment of Long Bone Defects: Current Clinical Application and Future Perspective

Clinical translation of a patient-specific scaffold-guided bone regeneration concept in four cases with large long bone defects

Scaffold-Based Regeneration of Skeletal Tissues to Meet Clinical Challenges

Reconstruction of Large Skeletal Defects: Current Clinical Therapeutic Strategies and Future Directions Using 3D Printing

Large-sized Bone Defect Repair by Combining a Decalcified Bone Matrix Framework and Bone Regeneration Units Based on Photo-Crosslinkable Osteogenic Microgels

Recent Advances in Biomaterials for the Treatment of Bone Defects

Convergence of scaffold-guided bone regeneration and RIA bone grafting for the treatment of a critical-sized bone defect of the femoral shaft

Bone substitutes: a review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management

BMSCs with tissue-engineered scaffolds for large bone segmental defects. A systematic review.

A Review of the Application of Natural and Synthetic Scaffolds in Bone Regeneration

Advanced Strategies of Scaffolds Design for Bone Regeneration

Biomaterials as Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering

Strategies for large bone defect reconstruction after trauma, infections or tumour excision: a comprehensive review of the literature

Osteogenesis, Vascularization and Osseointegration of a Bioactive Multiphase Macroporous Scaffold in the Treatment of Large Bone Defects

Autologous cell-based therapy for treatment of large bone defects: from bench to bedside

Existing and Novel Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering

Bio-integrated Scaffold Facilitates Large Bone Regeneration Dominated by Endochondral Ossification

Bone defect reconstruction via endochondral ossification: A developmental engineering strategy

Bone Tissue Engineering in the Treatment of Bone Defects