How racial bias can taint tenure decisions

Katie Langin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adt7202

IF: 56.9

2024-10-11

Science

Abstract:Black and Hispanic professors fare worse when voters are less familiar with their work

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

How race influences perceptions of objectivity and hiring preferences

Brittany Torrez,Cydney H. Dupree,Michael W. Kraus

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104524

IF: 3.532

2024-01-01

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Abstract:Objectivity norms can act as a source of mistrust of marginalized voices within organizations. In this paper, we study White evaluators' perceptions of Black applicants' objectivity and hireability in a field where objectivity is considered imperative: journalism. We predicted that Black journalists will be viewed as less objective and as having more ingroup bias regarding racial issues coverage compared to White journalists. Importantly, we expected these patterns to emerge in opposition to hiring judgments that would, overall, favor Black journalists over White journalists for roles reporting on racial issues due to perceptions of their racial expertise. Meta-analyses of three samples (N = 1725) found that White perceivers rated Black journalists as less objective and more biased, yet more racially expert and hireable, than White journalists. In follow up correlational analysis we found consistent evidence that perceptions of racial expertise positively impact hiring judgments for Black journalists even as perceptions of objectivity suppress hiring preferences. Overall, these studies illuminate the costs of racial marginalization in primarily-White workplaces, even when there are apparent hiring advantages, and demonstrate potential barriers to inclusion and accurate racial issues coverage.

psychology, social
Double standards in promotion and tenure

Damani White-Lewis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01975-9

IF: 24.252

2024-10-04

Nature Human Behaviour

Abstract:Despite much anecdotal evidence, few studies show pervasive racial bias in promotion and tenure decisions. By analysing 1,571 real promotion and tenure cases across five US universities, Masters-Waage et al. find double standards negatively applied to scholars of colour, and especially women of colour, even after accounting for scholarly productivity.

psychology, experimental,neurosciences,multidisciplinary sciences
Underrepresented minority faculty in the USA face a double standard in promotion and tenure decisions

Theodore Masters-Waage,Christiane Spitzmueller,Ebenezer Edema-Sillo,Ally St. Aubin,Michelle Penn-Marshall,Erika Henderson,Peggy Lindner,Cynthia Werner,Tracey Rizzuto,Juan Madera

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01977-7

IF: 24.252

2024-10-04

Nature Human Behaviour

Abstract:Underrepresented minority (URM) faculty face challenges in many domains of academia, from university admissions to grant applications. We examine whether this translates to promotion and tenure (P&T) decisions. Data from five US universities on 1,571 faculty members' P&T decisions show that URM faculty received 7% more negative votes and were 44% less likely to receive unanimous votes from P&T committees. A double standard in how scholarly productivity is rewarded is also observed, with below-average h -indexes being judged more harshly for URM faculty than for non-URM faculty. This relationship is amplified for faculty with intersectional backgrounds, especially URM women. The differential treatment of URM women was mitigated when external reviewers highlighted candidates' scholarship more in their review letters. In sum, the results support the double standard hypothesis and provide evidence that different outcomes in P&T decision-making processes contribute to the sustained underrepresentation of URM faculty in tenured faculty positions.

psychology, experimental,neurosciences,multidisciplinary sciences
An Unintentional, Robust, and Replicable Pro-Black Bias in Social Judgment

C. Ebersole,Brian A. Nosek,Jordan R. Axt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/SOCO.2016.34.1.1

2016-01-12

Abstract:Empirical evidence and social commentary demonstrate favoring of Whites over Blacks in attitudes, social judgment, and social behavior. In 6 studies (N > 4,000), we provide evidence for a pro-Black bias in academic decision making. When making multiple admissions decisions for an academic honor society, participants from undergraduate and online samples had a more relaxed acceptance criterion for Black than White candidates, even though participants possessed implicit and explicit preferences for Whites over Blacks. This pro-Black criterion bias persisted among subsamples that wanted to be unbiased and believed they were unbiased. It also persisted even when participants were given warning of the bias or incentives to perform accurately. These results suggest opportunity for theoretical and empirical innovation on the conditions under which biases in social judgment favor and disfavor different social groups, and how those biases manifest outside of awareness or control.

Psychology,Sociology
Gender and cultural bias in student evaluations: Why representation matters

Y. Fan,L. J. Shepherd,E. Slavich,D. Waters,M. Stone,R. Abel,E. L. Johnston

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209749

IF: 3.7

2019-02-13

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Gendered and racial inequalities persist in even the most progressive of workplaces. There is increasing evidence to suggest that all aspects of employment, from hiring to performance evaluation to promotion, are affected by gender and cultural background. In higher education, bias in performance evaluation has been posited as one of the reasons why few women make it to the upper echelons of the academic hierarchy. With unprecedented access to institution-wide student survey data from a large public university in Australia, we investigated the role of conscious or unconscious bias in terms of gender and cultural background. We found potential bias against women and teachers with non-English speaking backgrounds. Our findings suggest that bias may decrease with better representation of minority groups in the university workforce. Our findings have implications for society beyond the academy, as over 40% of the Australian population now go to university, and graduates may carry these biases with them into the workforce.

multidisciplinary sciences
The Price of Racial Bias

Jennifer T. Kubota,Jian Li,Eyal Bar-David,Mahzarin R. Banaji,Elizabeth A. Phelps

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613496435

IF: 10.172

2013-01-01

Psychological Science

Abstract:Existing stereotypes about Black Americans may influence perceptions of intent during financial negotiations. In this study, we explored whether the influence of race on economic decisions extends to choices that are costly to the decision maker. We investigated whether racial group membership contributes to differential likelihood of rejection of objectively equal unfair monetary offers. In the Ultimatum Game, players accept or reject proposed splits of money. Players keep accepted splits, but if a player rejects an offer, both the player and the proposer receive nothing. We found that participants accepted more offers and lower offer amounts from White proposers than from Black proposers, and that this pattern was accentuated for participants with higher implicit race bias. These findings indicate that participants are willing to discriminate against Black proposers even at a cost to their own financial gain.
Where Are All the Black Teachers? Discrimination in the Teacher Labor Market

Diana D'amico,Robert J. Pawlewicz,Penelope M. Earley,Adam P. McGeehan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-87.1.26

2017-03-01

Harvard Educational Review

Abstract:In this article, Diana D'Amico, Robert J. Pawlewicz, Penelope M. Earley, and Adam P. McGeehan examine the racial composition of one public school district's teacher labor market through teacher application data and subsequent hiring decisions. Researchers and policy makers have long noted the lack of racial diversity among the nation's public school teachers and identified supply as the root cause. Using a historical framework and problem definition theory, the authors question this supposition and explore the issue as a function of demand. Investigating a unique data set comprising all of the applications for teaching positions in a single, large school district, they analyze the extent to which race is associated with principals' hiring decisions. They explore the rates at which Black and White candidates apply for teaching positions and compare those to the rates at which they are hired and the school demographics in which they are placed. Through a logistic regression analysis, the authors present evidence of discrimination in teacher hiring. Ceteris paribus, Black applicants were significantly less likely than their White counterparts to receive a job offer. Further, they find evidence of workforce segregation: when hired, Black teachers were significantly more likely to be placed in schools with large populations of children of color and children in poverty or schools characterized as struggling. The authors call for researchers, policy makers, and school leaders at the district and building levels to examine hiring practices, which may be symptomatic of broader institutional biases, so that they may identify and eliminate inherent prejudices.

education & educational research
Epistemic exclusion: A theory for understanding racism in faculty research evaluations.

Isis H. Settles,Martinque K. Jones,NiCole T. Buchanan,Kristie Dotson,Petal Grower,Michael O’Rourke,Marisa Rinkus,Kyjeila Latimer,Michael O'Rourke

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001313

IF: 16.358

2024-07-23

American Psychologist

Abstract:Despite institutional efforts, growth in the number of faculty of color has largely plateaued, limiting research innovation and other benefits of diversity. In this article, we seek to understand structural barriers to faculty equity by (a) detailing a theory of epistemic exclusion within academia and (b) applying the theory of epistemic exclusion to the specific context of faculty departmental reviews of scholarly research (e.g., annual review, promotion and tenure review). Epistemic exclusion is a form of scholarly devaluation that is rooted in disciplinary biases about the qualities of rigorous research and identity-based biases about the competence of marginalized group members. These biases work in tandem to systemically and disproportionately exclude marginalized scholars (e.g., people of color, women) from the academy. In the context of faculty departmental reviews, epistemic exclusion can happen in formal systems of evaluation through criteria, metric, and application exclusion. It can also occur informally during interpersonal interactions and communications through legitimacy, contribution, and comprehension exclusion. In this article, we detail each of these types of exclusion, how they may interact with each other, and their consequences. We assert that epistemic exclusion threatens the diversification of academia and offer suggestions for equitable evaluation practices and reducing epistemic exclusion within higher education broadly. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

psychology, multidisciplinary
Avoiding bias when inferring race using name-based approaches

Diego Kozlowski,Dakota S. Murray,Alexis Bell,Will Hulsey,Vincent Larivière,Thema Monroe-White,Cassidy R. Sugimoto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264270

2021-10-12

Abstract:Racial disparity in academia is a widely acknowledged problem. The quantitative understanding of racial based systemic inequalities is an important step towards a more equitable research system. However, because of the lack of robust information on authors' race, few large scale analyses have been performed on this topic. Algorithmic approaches offer one solution, using known information about authors, such as their names, to infer their perceived race. As with any other algorithm, the process of racial inference can generate biases if it is not carefully considered. The goal of this article is to assess the extent to which algorithmic bias is introduced using different approaches for name based racial inference. We use information from the U.S. Census and mortgage applications to infer the race of U.S. affiliated authors in the Web of Science. We estimate the effects of using given and family names, thresholds or continuous distributions, and imputation. Our results demonstrate that the validity of name based inference varies by race/ethnicity and that threshold approaches underestimate Black authors and overestimate White authors. We conclude with recommendations to avoid potential biases. This article lays the foundation for more systematic and less biased investigations into racial disparities in science.

Computers and Society,Information Retrieval,Physics and Society
Reducing racial bias in scientific communication: Journal policies and their influence on reporting racial demographics.

Sakaria Laisene Auelua-Toomey,Elizabeth Mortenson,Steven Othello Roberts

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001310

IF: 16.358

2024-07-23

American Psychologist

Abstract:Research titles with White samples, compared to research titles with samples of color, have been less likely to include the racial identity of the sample. This unequal writing practice has serious ramifications for both the history and future of psychological science, as it solidifies in the permanent scientific record the false notion that research with White samples is more generalizable and valuable than research with samples of color. In the present research, we experimentally tested the extent to which PhD students (63% White students, 27% students of color) engaged in this unequal writing practice, as well as the extent to which this practice might be disrupted by journal policies. In Study 1, PhD students who read about research conducted with a White sample, compared to those who read about the exact same research conducted with a Black sample, were significantly less likely to mention the sample's racial identity when generating research titles, keywords, and summaries. In Study 2, PhD students instructed to mention the racial identity of their samples, and PhD students instructed to not mention the identity of their samples (though to a lesser extent), were less likely to write about the White versus Black samples unequally. Across both studies, we found that PhD students were overall supportive of a policy to make the racial demographics of samples more transparent, believing that it would help to reduce racial biases in the field. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

psychology, multidisciplinary
Quality and quantity: How contexts influence the emergence of teacher bias

Lewis Doyle,Peter R. Harris,Matthew J. Easterbrook

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09882-z

2024-01-08

Social Psychology of Education

Abstract:A growing body of research has demonstrated that teachers' judgements may be biased by the demographics and characteristics of the students they teach. However, less work has investigated the contexts in which teachers may be most vulnerable to bias. In two pre-registered experimental studies we explored whether the quality of students' work, and the cognitive load placed on the grader, would influence the emergence of biases relating to socioeconomic status (SES) and ethnicity. In Study 1, teachers ( N = 397) graded work of either high or low quality that had ostensibly been written by a student who varied in terms of SES and ethnicity. We found that SES and—to a lesser extent—ethnicity biases were more likely to manifest when the standard of work was below average, largely favouring a student from an affluent White background. In Study 2, an undergraduate sample ( N = 334) provided judgements based on an identical piece of work written by a student who varied by SES and ethnicity. Importantly, they formulated these judgements whilst working under high or low cognitive load, which was manipulated via a simultaneous listening task. Results showed that under high cognitive load, a student from an affluent White British background was afforded a boost in grading that was not afforded to Black Caribbean and/or lower SES students. These findings highlight contexts in which teachers may be most prone to biased judgements and should be used by educational institutions to de-bias their workflows, workloads and workforces.

psychology, educational
Discrimination and Bias, Underrepresentation, and Sense of Belonging on Campus

Sylvia Hurtado,A. R. Alvarado

2015-10-01

Abstract:In recent years, American cities and college campuses experienced protests over outrage and a sense of injustice ignited by events where Black youth were shot and killed by authorities. While these events capture national attention, researchers have identified more subtle and pervasive forms of discrimination and bias in education and work environments.1 College campuses, as microcosms of society, are not immune from these issues. Campus racial climate models indicate an interrelationship between racial/ethnic composition of the campus, perceptions of the campus as hostile or welcoming, and cross-racial interaction on campus that influence educational outcomes.2 Research has established the educational value of frequent and quality interactions across race/ethnicity for both racial/ ethnic minority and majority students. Positive interactions resulted in desirable outcomes, while negative interactions with diverse peers resulted in lower scores on many academic and democratic outcomes.3 Given recent sociohistorical events, it is important to understand the context for negative interactions. The central question we address is whether distinctions in the college composition of Blacks, Latina/ os, and Native Americans are associated with rates of discrimination and bias on campus. In a previous HERI brief, we concluded low representation of these groups is detrimental to campus climate and subsequent participation in a diverse workforce.4 We extend this research to show the relationship between students’ discrimination and bias experiences among African American and Latina/o college students averaged across six years of national data collection and students’ sense of belonging on campus, a key antecedent to retention in college. The data for this brief come from the experiences of 8,887 underrepresented minority (URM) students who attended 58 four-year campuses that took part in the Diverse Learning Environments (DLE) survey between 2010 and 2015. The DLE is a national survey designed to assist campuses in evaluating their campus climate, institutional practices, and student outcomes.5 The sample includes 24 public and 34 private four-year institutions that vary in terms of URM enrollment, including public campuses in Texas and California that no longer use race in admissions decisions. In order to track change from the previous research brief, the data are focused on institutions where African Americans are not the largest minority group. A larger dataset (82 campuses) was also used to specifically illustrate Latina/o student patterns of discrimination and bias experiences. The same cutoffs for URM representation were used to categorize campuses into low (less than 20%), moderate (21–35%), and high representation (36% and above) as in previous research.6 Discrimination and Bias, Underrepresentation, and Sense of Belonging on Campus

Psychology,Sociology
Subtle discrimination: do stereotypes among teachers trigger bias in their expectations and widen ethnic achievement gaps?

Georg Lorenz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09615-0

2021-03-16

Social Psychology of Education

Abstract:Abstract Ethnic and racial disparities in educational outcomes, such as test scores, are a core issue of educational research. While the role of student and family factors in the formation of such disparities is well established, existing studies fail to draw a similarly clear picture of how teachers contribute to ethnic and racial achievement gaps. In contrast to previous studies, which focussed on the consequences of rather blatant forms of discrimination, such as in teachers’ grading practices, this study investigates rather subtle processes that might result in discrimination of ethnic and racial minority students. In particular, I address stereotypes among teachers and analyse if they induce bias in their achievement expectations for ethnic minority school beginners. Additionally, I analyse if such bias results in a self-fulfilling prophecy and contributes to ethnic achievement gaps at the end of first grade. Multilevel regressions applied to a sample of 1007 children and 64 teachers in German primary schools reveal that different teachers internalize distinct stereotypes regarding ethnic achievement gaps and the achievement-related attributes of ethnic minority students. I also find that teachers with more negative stereotypes expect lower mathematics and reading achievements for ethnic minority students at the beginning of first grade. However, although I replicate the finding that inaccurate teacher expectations result in a self-fulfilling prophecy, I find no statistically significant effects of teacher stereotypes on ethnic differences in the development of students’ reading and mathematical skills throughout first grade.

psychology, educational
Getting In, Getting Hired, Getting Sideways Looks: Organizational Hierarchy and Perceptions of Racial Discrimination

Adia Harvey Wingfield,Koji Chavez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419894335

IF: 12.444

2020-01-02

American Sociological Review

Abstract:This article argues that black workers’ perceptions of racial discrimination derive not just from being in the minority, but also from their position in the organizational structure. Researchers have shown that black individuals encounter an enormous amount of racial discrimination in the workplace, including but not limited to exclusion from critical social networks, wage disparities, and hiring disadvantages. But fewer studies examine the extent to which black workers believe racial discrimination is a salient factor in their occupational mobility or the factors that might explain their divergent perceptions of racial discrimination. Based on 60 in-depth interviews with black medical doctors, nurses, and technicians in the healthcare industry, we show that black workers’ status within an organizational hierarchy fundamentally informs perceptions of the nature and type of workplace racial discrimination. These findings have implications for understanding how racial dynamics at work are linked to mental health, occupational satisfaction, and organizational change.

sociology
Career decisions: Of academic interest

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7533-233a

IF: 64.8

2015-01-01

Nature

Abstract:Women and minority groups report declining interest in faculty posts over graduate career.

multidisciplinary sciences
Racial and Ethnic Bias in Letters of Recommendation in Academic Medicine: A Systematic Review

Saarang R Deshpande,Gina Lepore,Lily Wieland,Jennifer R Kogan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005688

2024-09-01

Abstract:Purpose: Letters of recommendations (LORs) are key components of academic medicine applications. Given that bias against students and trainees underrepresented in medicine (UIM) has been demonstrated across assessment, achievement, and advancement domains, the authors reviewed studies on LORs to assess racial, ethnic, and UIM differences in LORs. Standardized LORs (SLORs), an increasingly common form of LORs, were also assessed for racial and ethnic differences. Method: A systematic review was conducted for English-language studies that assessed racial or ethnic differences in LORs in academic medicine published from database inception to July 16, 2023. Studies evaluating SLORs underwent data abstraction to evaluate their impact on the given race or ethnicity comparison and outcome variables. Results: Twenty-three studies describing 19,012 applicants and 41,925 LORs were included. Nineteen studies (82.6%) assessed LORs for residency, 4 (17.4%) assessed LORs for fellowship, and none evaluated employment or promotion. Fifteen of 17 studies (88.2%) assessing linguistic differences reported a significant difference in a particular race or ethnicity comparison. Of the 7 studies assessing agentic language (e.g., "strong," "confident"), 1 study found fewer agentic terms used for Black and Latinx applicants, and 1 study reported higher agency scores for Asian applicants and applicants of races other than White. There were mixed results for the use of communal and grindstone language in UIM and non-UIM comparisons. Among 6 studies, 4 (66.7%) reported that standout language (e.g., "exceptional," "outstanding") was less likely to be ascribed to UIM applicants. Doubt-raising language was more frequently used for UIM trainees. When SLORs and unstructured LORs were compared, fewer linguistic differences were found in SLORs. Conclusions: There is a moderate bias against UIM candidates in the domains of linguistic differences, doubt-raising language, and topics discussed in LORs, which has implications for perceptions of competence and ability in the high-stakes residency and fellowship application process.
Biased Voices of Sports: Racial and Gender Stereotyping in College Basketball Announcing

Andrew C. Billings Susan Tyler Eastman,Susan Tyler Eastman, Andrew C. Billings

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/106461701753287714

2001-10-01

Howard Journal of Communications

Abstract:The words of sportscasters−repeated hundreds, even thousands, of times by different announcers in similar ways−provide a conceptual frame for the sports experience, and that mental frame has particular importance because fans often apply it to nonathletic situations. Contrary to assertions by some critics, analysis of 1,156 descriptors in sportscaster commentary during 66 televised men's and women's college basketball games showed no significant difference between the proportions of commentary and proportions of participating Black and White men players, but showed some overemphasis in comments about White women players. Predictably, Black men players tended to be stereotyped as naturally athletic, quick, and powerful, while White men players continued to be touted for their hard work, effort, and mental skill. The same racial stereotypes also appeared in the commentary about women basketball players, but few gender stereotypes emerged. Thus, increases in the numbers of Black and women game announcers may have lent balance to quantities of coverage by race and gender, but traditional racial stereotypes continue to pervade sports commentary even when gender stereotypes appear to be diminishing.

English Else
Racial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasets

Thomas Davidson,Debasmita Bhattacharya,Ingmar Weber

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.12516

2019-05-29

Abstract:Technologies for abusive language detection are being developed and applied with little consideration of their potential biases. We examine racial bias in five different sets of Twitter data annotated for hate speech and abusive language. We train classifiers on these datasets and compare the predictions of these classifiers on tweets written in African-American English with those written in Standard American English. The results show evidence of systematic racial bias in all datasets, as classifiers trained on them tend to predict that tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates. If these abusive language detection systems are used in the field they will therefore have a disproportionate negative impact on African-American social media users. Consequently, these systems may discriminate against the groups who are often the targets of the abuse we are trying to detect.

Computation and Language,Machine Learning
The impact of demographic structure on citizen perceptions of school district efficiency

Eric J. Brunner,Mark D. Robbins,Bill Simonsen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2024.2308511

2024-02-21

Journal of Urban Affairs

Abstract:Researchers have found that elderly white voters are less supportive of school spending if they reside in a community with a high concentration of non-white school children, a finding typically attributed to growing intergenerational and ethnic conflict between older and younger generations. We test whether white voters living in high minority areas are more likely to perceive their schools as being inefficient and find evidence of such racial mismatch consistent with the literature. One explanation is that white voters in high minority areas may believe schools are inefficient because of the correlation between minority concentration and poverty, given that it is more expensive to educate children in poverty. A second possibility is that white voters in high minority areas believe schools are inefficient because of bias, whether conscious or unconscious. We find convincing evidence of this second explanation that bias produces the racial mismatch effect for older white individuals.

urban studies
How Racism Against BIPOC Women Faculty Operates in Social Work Academia

Sameena Azhar,Kendra P. DeLoach McCutcheon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18060/24118

2021-09-23

Advances in Social Work

Abstract:In this article, we seek to highlight the ways in which we, as two female social work faculty members whose racial/ethnic identities fall into the categories of Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color (BIPOC), have experienced racism and White supremacy within predominantly White institutions in the United States. We seek to clarify that these experiences are not unique to any particular institution or university, but rather reflect systemic racism and the upholding of White supremacy in higher education in social work throughout the United States. We highlight the differential vulnerability faced by BIPOC women in academia, which are often unaddressed in the pursuit of what is seen to be an egalitarian or colorblind merit review. Bearing in mind our reflexivity on our positionalities, we share personal narratives regarding our own marginalization within White spaces and the emotional labor that we are often asked to carry for the institutions within which we work. We will elucidate experiences of tokenization or assumed intellectual inferiority by our peers. Given the current sociopolitical moment and the heightened awareness of diversity, equity and inclusion efforts within universities, we also reflect on how institutions of higher education, and particularly schools of social work, can move beyond simply hiring more people of color or conducting diversity trainings to ensuring that BIPOC women are more fully included in their roles within universities as faculty, administrators, staff and students.

How racial bias can taint tenure decisions

How race influences perceptions of objectivity and hiring preferences

Double standards in promotion and tenure

Underrepresented minority faculty in the USA face a double standard in promotion and tenure decisions

An Unintentional, Robust, and Replicable Pro-Black Bias in Social Judgment

Gender and cultural bias in student evaluations: Why representation matters

The Price of Racial Bias

Where Are All the Black Teachers? Discrimination in the Teacher Labor Market

Epistemic exclusion: A theory for understanding racism in faculty research evaluations.

Avoiding bias when inferring race using name-based approaches

Reducing racial bias in scientific communication: Journal policies and their influence on reporting racial demographics.

Quality and quantity: How contexts influence the emergence of teacher bias

Discrimination and Bias, Underrepresentation, and Sense of Belonging on Campus

Subtle discrimination: do stereotypes among teachers trigger bias in their expectations and widen ethnic achievement gaps?

Getting In, Getting Hired, Getting Sideways Looks: Organizational Hierarchy and Perceptions of Racial Discrimination

Career decisions: Of academic interest

Racial and Ethnic Bias in Letters of Recommendation in Academic Medicine: A Systematic Review

Biased Voices of Sports: Racial and Gender Stereotyping in College Basketball Announcing

Racial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasets

The impact of demographic structure on citizen perceptions of school district efficiency

How Racism Against BIPOC Women Faculty Operates in Social Work Academia