Abstract:OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stent placement after percutaneous recanalization of superior vena cava (SVC) stenosis in maintenance hemodialysis patients. METHODS Adult maintenance hemodialysis patients hospitalized at a university-affiliated tertiary hospital due to SVC stenosis from January 2016 to June 2023 were prospectively included. The efficacy and safety of percutaneous blunt/sharp SVC recanalization combined with SVC stent placement were observed. The patients' demographic information and laboratory examination data, stent placement success rate, surgery-related complications, and long-term vascular access patency rate were also recorded and analyzed. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee (2015-201) and registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn (registry number: ChiCTR-ONN-16007790). RESULTS A total of 58 patients were included in the study with an average age of 54.79±13.42 years. Percutaneous SVC recanalization was successful in 53 cases, with a success rate of 91.38%, including 37 cases of traditional recanalization and 16 cases of sharp recanalization. Among 53 hemodialysis patients who underwent SVC recanalization, 14 patients successfully received covered stents and 38 patients received bare metal stents, achieving a stent placement success rate of 98.1%. One patient encountered stent displacement into the heart immediately after implantation, causing intra-operative cardiac tamponade, who was successfully rescued by thoracotomy. Fifty-two patients were followed-up for median period of 26 months (cuffed catheter: 25 patients, arteriovenous fistula [AVF]: 27 patients). The overall 2-year vascular access patency rate was 33.2% (cuffed catheter: 22.2%, AVF: 41.7%, p=0.414). There was no statistically significant difference in the 2-year vascular access patency rate between the traditional recanalization group and the sharp recanalization group (34.1% vs 31.1%, p=0.731) and between bare metal stent group and covered stent group (38.1% vs 21.4%, p=0.248). CONCLUSION Percutaneous SVC recanalization with stent placement is an effective treatment strategy that can provide viable vascular access for maintenance hemodialysis patients with SVC stenosis. Cautions should be paid to potential life-threatening complications such as stent displacement and cardiac tamponade. CLINICAL IMPACT Superior vena cava (SVC) stenosis is a common central venous occlusive lesion in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Whether stent should be implanted simultaneously following SVC recanalization is still lacking research. This pilot cohort study suggested that percutaneous SVC recanalization with stent placement was an effective treatment strategy which provides satisfactory vascular access for hemodialysis. We further found that SVC sharp recanalization with subsequent stent implantation was a feasible treatment, with the 2-year vascular access patency comparable to the traditional SVC recanalization group. This study also highlighted endovascular SVC recanalization should be performed with caution, and appropriate balloon sizes should be selected to avoid SVC rupture or stent displacement.

Risk factors for hypotension in patients with hemodialysis-associated superior vena cava syndrome

Cerebral Venous Thrombosis in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: A Report on 4 Cases and a Review of the Literature.

Long-Term Predialysis Systolic Blood Pressure Variability and Intradialytic Cardiac Hemodynamics in Hemodialysis Patients

Inferior vena cava collapsibility index for predicting hypotension after spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

Endovascular treatment of central venous stenosis and obstruction in hemodialysis patients.

Vascular access challenges in hemodialysis patients with superior vena cava syndrome

The predictive value of ultrasound didution in monitoring hypotension in hemodialysis patients

End‐stage renal disease in a critical patient with superior vena cava syndrome with central vein catheters inserted via the superficial femoral vein: A case study

Success Rate of Endovascular Intervention in the Treatment of Central Venous Stenosis or Occlusion in Hemodialysis Patients

Analysis on the occurrence and influencing factors of frequent intradialytic hypotension in hemodialysis patients

A study on the risk factors for intradialytic-hypotension among maintenance hemodialysis patients

Incidence and associated factors for hypotension during continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients

Intraoperative hypotension and complications after vascular surgery: A scoping review

Stent Placement After Percutaneous Recanalization of Superior Vena Cava Stenosis in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients.

Successful management of fatal cardiac tamponade resulting from intravascular intervention for central vein occlusion in hemodialysis patients: A case report

Diagnosis and Treatment of Central Venous Stenosis in Haemodialysis Patients

The relationships of circulating blood volume,cardiac output,peripheral vascular resistance when hypotcnsion in haemodialysis by ultrasound dilution

Hemorrhagic pericardial tamponade in a hemodialysis patient with catheter-related superior vena cava syndrome: a case report

The importance of ultrasonography in surgical treatment of vascular access for hemodialysis complications

Advance in prevention and management of dialysis-associated hypotension

Interdialytic blood pressure variability and the risk of stroke in maintenance hemodialysis patients.