Subdural hygroma following decompressive craniectomy or non-decompressive craniectomy in patients with traumatic brain injury: Clinical features and risk factors.
Qiang Yuan,Xing Wu,Jian Yu,Yirui Sun,Zhiqi Li,Zhuoying Du,Xuehai Wu,Liangfu Zhou,Jin Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2015.1004760
2015-01-01
Brain Injury
Abstract:Objective: Subdural hygroma (SDG) is a common complication that can occur after head trauma or secondary to decompressive craniectomy (DC). SDGs can be located not only ipsilateral or contralateral to the side of the DC, but also bilateral or unilateral in patients without DC. This study investigated the incidence and risk factors for different types of SDG in a large cohort of patients with traumatic brain injury (TB:). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted involving 379 adult patients with TBI who were admitted to Huashan Hospital, Fudan University between January 2009 and December 2013. As the outcome was dichotomous (SDG vs no SDG or hydrocephalus vs no hydrocephalus), multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors for the development of SDGs in patients without DC, ipsilateral SDG after unilateral DC, contralateral SDG after unilateral DC or SDG after bilateral DC. Risk factors for the development of hydrocephalus were also evaluated in patients with and without DC. Results: Among the 207 (54.6%) patients without DC, 30 (14.5%) had unilateral SDGs and 34 (16.4%) had bilateral SDGs. Of the 172 patients (45.4%) with DC, 134 (77.9%) underwent unilateral DC and 38 (22.1%) underwent bilateral DC. Of the 134 patients who underwent unilateral DC, 49 developed SDG, including 22 (16.4%) ipsilateral SDG, 19 (14.2%) contralateral SDG and eight (6.0%) both ipsilateral and contralateral SDGs. For patients undergoing bilateral DC, 13 (34.2%) developed a SDG. No significant difference in the incidence of SDG was observed between the patients with and without DC (36.0% vs 30.9%, p = 0.291), but the characteristics of SDGs were different between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that factors independently associated with the development of SDG were male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 3.861; 95% CI = 1.642-9.091; p = 0.002), older age (OR = 1.046; 95% CI = 1.021-1.070; p < 0.001), basal cistern haemorrhage (OR = 4.608; 95% CI = 1.510-14.064; p = 0.007), diffuse injury and swelling (OR = 3.158; 95% CI = 1.341-7.435; p = 0.008) or diffuse injury and shift (OR = 3.826; 95% CI = 1.141-12.830; p = 0.030) in patients without DC. Temporal haematoma or contusion in the non-DC side (OR = 2.623; 95% CI = 1.070-6.428; p = 0.035) and traumatic SAH (OR = 3.751; 95% CI = 1.047-13.438; p = 0.042) were independently associated with the development of ipsilateral SDG in patients who underwent unilateral DC. However, factors independently associated with the development of contralateral SDG were frontal haematoma or contusion on the non-DC side (OR = 3.145; 95% CI = 1.272-7.774; p = 0.013) and SDH on the non-DC side (OR = 7.024; 95% CI = 1.477-33.390; p = 0.014). Only craniectomy area (OR = 1.030; 95% CI = 1.008-1.052; p = 0.008) was independently associated with the development of SDG in patients with bilateral DC. In the multivariate analysis, SDG in patients without DC was not associated with the development of hydrocephalus. However, SDG was significantly associated with the development of hydrocephalus for patients who underwent DC (OR = 2.173; 95% CI = 1.362-3.467; p = 0.001). Conclusions: This study suggested that the incidence of SDG in patients who have and have not undergone DC was identical; however, the patients' characteristics and risk factors differed. Therefore, the management and prediction of SDG should be performed according to SDG type.