Discrepancies in glycemic metrics derived from different continuous glucose monitoring systems in adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus成人1型糖尿病患者使用不同的连续血糖监测仪时血糖指标的差异

Yongwen Zhou,Xiaodong Mai,Hongrong Deng,Daizhi Yang,Mao Zheng,Bin Huang,Linlin Xu,Jianping Weng,Wen Xu,Jinhua Yan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.13296
IF: 4.53
2022-07-27
Journal of Diabetes
Abstract:Highlights The accordance between the paired dataset between FSL and iPro2 was acceptable but poorer in hypoglycemic range. Significant differences for glycemic metrics between iPro2 and FSL were observed in time in range 70–180 mg/dL, coefficient of variation, and hypoglycemia‐related parameters (including time below range 54 mg/dL and 70mg/dL). The study reminded us when using the CGM for clinical decisions and clinical trials, it is necessary to consider the model heterogeneity. Background Continuous glucose monitoring systems have been widely used but discrepancies among various brands of devices are rarely discussed. This study aimed to explore differences in glycemic metrics between FreeStyle Libre (FSL) and iPro2 among adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Methods Participants with T1DM and glycosylated hemoglobin of 7%–10% were included and wore FSL and iPro2 for 2 weeks simultaneously. Datasets collected on the insertion and detachment day, and those with insufficient quantity (<90%) were excluded. Agreements of measurement accuracy and glycemic metrics were evaluated. Results A total of 40 498 paired data were included. Compared with the values from FSL, significantly higher median value was observed in iPro2 (147.6 [106.2, 192.6] vs. 144.0 [100.8, 192.6] mg/dl, p
endocrinology & metabolism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?