Abstract:BACKGROUND The FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system entered the Chinese market in 2017 to complement the self-monitoring of blood glucose. Due to its increased usage in clinics, the number of studies investigating its accuracy has increased. However, its accuracy has not been investigated in highland popu-lations in China. AIM To evaluate measurements recorded using the FreeStyle Libre FGM system compared with capillary blood glucose measured using the enzyme electrode method in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who had migrated within 3 mo from highlands to plains. METHODS Overall, 68 patients with T2D, selected from those who had recently migrated from highlands to plains (within 3 mo), were hospitalized at the Department of Endocrinology from August to October 2017 and underwent continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with the FreeStyle Libre FGM system for 14 d. Throughout the study period, fingertip capillary blood glucose was measured daily using the enzyme electrode method (Super GL, China), and blood glucose levels were read from the scanning probe during fasting and 2 h after all three meals. Moreover, the time interval between reading the data from the scanning probe and collecting fingertip capillary blood was controlled to < 5 min. The accuracy of the FGM system was evaluated according to the CGM guidelines. Subsequently, the factors influencing the mean absolute relative difference (MARD) of this system were analyzed by a multiple linear regression method. RESULTS Pearson's correlation analysis showed that the fingertip and scanned glucose levels were positively correlated (R = 0.86, P = 0.00). The aggregated MARD of scanned glucose was 14.28 ± 13.40%. Parker's error analysis showed that 99.30% of the data pairs were located in areas A and B. According to the probe wear time of the FreeStyle Libre FGM system, MARD1 d and MARD2–14 d were 16.55% and 14.35%, respectively (t = 1.23, P = 0.22). Multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that MARD did not correlate with blood glucose when the largest amplitude of glycemic excursion (LAGE) was < 5.80 mmol/L but negatively correlated with blood glucose when the LAGE was ≥ 5.80 mmol/L. CONCLUSION The FreeStyle Libre FGM system has good accuracy in patients with T2D who had recently migrated from highlands to plains. This system might be ideal for avoiding the effects of high hematocrit on blood glucose monitoring in populations that recently migrated to plains. MARD is mainly influenced by glucose levels and fluctuations, and the accuracy of the system is higher when the blood glucose fluctuation is small. In case of higher blood glucose level fluctuations, deviation in the scanned glucose levels is the highest at extremely low blood glucose levels.

Glucose values from the same continuous glucose monitoring sensor significantly differ among readers with different generations of algorithm

Difference in the accuracy of the third-generation algorithm and the first-generation algorithm of FreeStyle Libre continuous glucose monitoring device

Accuracy of the Third Generation of a 14-Day Continuous Glucose Monitoring System

Analytical Performance of the FreeStyle Libre 2 Glucose Sensor in Healthy Male Adults

Relationship Between Hba1c and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Chinese Population: A Multicenter Study

Glycemic metrics in Japanese isCGM users - Analysis by diabetes type and therapy

Discrepancies in glycemic metrics derived from different continuous glucose monitoring systems in adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus成人1型糖尿病患者使用不同的连续血糖监测仪时血糖指标的差异

Reference values for continuous glucose monitoring in Chinese subjects.

Analytical Performance of the Factory-Calibrated Flash Glucose Monitoring System FreeStyle Libre2TM in Healthy Women

[Accuracy and Safety of Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Subjects].

Establishment Of Normal Reference Ranges For Glycemic Variability In Chinese Subjects Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Differences in the System Accuracy Acceptability of Four Types of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Against Five Different Standards

FreeStyle Libre and Dexcom G4 Platinum sensors: Accuracy comparisons during two weeks of home use and use during experimentally induced glucose excursions

Continuous glucose monitoring and intrapersonal variability in fasting glucose

Breaking through diabetes management barriers: Assessing the accuracy of Freestyle Libre Pro flash continuous glucose monitoring in diabetes patients with myocardial infarction

Accuracy, Utilization, and Effectiveness Comparisons of Different Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems

Discrepancies in Key Metrics of Glycemic Control between Retrospective Continuous Glucose Monitoring System and Flash Glucose Monitoring in Adult Patients with Type 1 Diabetes

Accuracy Assessment of Continuous Glucose Monitoring by Frequent Venous Blood Collection in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Accuracy of FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes who migrated from highlands to plains

[Characteristics of Real-Life Glucose Profiles Monitored by Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Persons with Normal Glucose Tolerance].

Estimating Glycemia From HbA1c and CGM: Analysis of Accuracy and Sources of Discrepancy