Abstract:Abstract Background Conduction System Pacing (CSP) includes both His Bundle Pacing (HBP) and Left Bundle Branch Pacing (LBBP). It guarantees physiological cardiac activation and it is essential to avoid pacing-induced dyssynchrony. Markedly dilated atria, up-grading to CRT, and congenital cardiopathies still represent complex anatomical scenarios in which the available tools could often result inadequate and graved by suboptimal results. Objective To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of 3D electro-anatomical mapping (EAM) to guide CSP (both HBP and LBBP) in patients with characteristics that allows “a priori” classification as complex anatomical scenario with low probability of success using only fluoroscopic guidance and available tools. Left atrium area >40 cm2; post-PICM up-grading and congenital heart disease were considered signs of anatomical complexity. Methods and results The study includes 25 patients (19 males, mean age 76–11 years; mean baseline EF 34.2–12.6%; 17 BBB; 5 post-PICM up-grading), candidates for CSP. 16 and 9 were respectively implanted with PM and ICD (13/12 dual/three-chamber devices). CARTO system was used in 6 ptss and EnsiteTM Precision in 19. EAM involved reconstruction of the right atrium and sub-tricuspid septum with the use of a decapolar catheter. Several “tags” have been placed on the His signals, in order to reconstruct the “His Cloud” and distinguish within it the proximal, medium, and distal area (Fig. 1). The sub-tricuspid septum was always reconstructed so that intra-procedurally operator could easily move from HBP to LBBP based on electrical parameters or paced QRS morphology. The mapping catheter was removed after the mapping phase and replaced with the pacing lead. Both exposed fixed screw 3830 leads and standard stylet-driven leads were used. HBP was achieved in 10 pts and LBBP in 13 pts. Three failures were resolved by CS lead implant. The time spend for His cloud mapping was 18±7 min. The mean threshold was 1.1±0.5 V; sensing 11.6±9.3 mV and impedance 786±339 ohm. Baseline QRS 155±19 ms and paced QRS 119±7 ms. In cases of LBBP we were also able to measure on the EAM map the depth of the catheter within the septum, resulting in 11.5±3.1 mm and the distance of the initial screw site from the His of 26.5±10.3 mm. Conclusions The electro-anatomical mapping allows the accurate reconstruction of “His cloud” by properly distinguishing proximal, middle, distal His. The sub-tricuspid zone of the interventricular septum is also reconstructed in high definition, so that intra-procedurally it is possible to easily move from HBP to LBBP and vice-versa based on the electrical parameters and paced QRS morphology. This method appears safe and effective even in complex cardiac anatomies possibly saving time and fluoroscopy use. The tags on the His cloud and sub-tricuspid septum can satisfactorily guide lead placement with high reproducibly. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1. 3D-EAM used to guide HBP implant

Personalized computational electro-mechanics simulations to optimize cardiac resynchronization therapy

A Study of Mechanical Optimization Strategy for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Based on an Electromechanical Model

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing

A prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of an intracardiac electrogram-based atrioventricular and interventricular intervals optimization method in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Personalized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Guided by Real-time Electrocardiographic Imaging for Non-Left Bundle Branch Block patients

Machine learning of ECG waveforms and cardiac magnetic resonance for response and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy

3D Electro-Anatomical Mapping to Guide Conduction System Pacing in Complex Cardiac Anatomies

Successful Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Reduces Negative Septal Work in Patient-Specific Models of Dyssynchronous Heart Failure

Ventricular-Arterial Coupling in Patients with Heart Failure Treated with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: May We Predict the Long-Term Clinical Response?

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block

Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guided Left Ventricular Lead Implantation to Improve the Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy:Rationale and Design

Current Role of Electrocardiographic Imaging in Patient Selection for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Characterization of cardiac resynchronization therapy response through machine learning and personalized models

Optimizing electrical efficacy of leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy and leadless left ventricular septal pacing: Insights on left and right ventricular activation from electrocardiographic imaging

Optimizing CRT - Do We Need More Leads and Delivery Methods

Non-invasive three-dimensional electrical activation mapping to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy response: site of latest left ventricular activation relative to pacing site

Virtual pacing of a patient’s digital twin to predict left ventricular reverse remodelling after cardiac resynchronization therapy

Regional Left Ventricular Fiber Stress Analysis for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response

Understanding Nonresponders of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy—Current and Future Perspectives

The implementation of speckle tracking echocardiography for cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization. A rotational myocardial mechanics interpretation