Phase 3 randomized COMMODORE 1 trial: Crovalimab versus eculizumab in complement inhibitor‐experienced patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria

Phillip Scheinberg,Diego Villa Clé,Jin Seok Kim,Erfan Nur,Mustafa N. Yenerel,Wilma Barcellini,Debora Bonito,Valentina Giai,Marek Hus,YooJin Lee,Cristina Barrenetxea Lekue,Jens Panse,Yasutaka Ueda,Simon Buatois,Brittany Gentile,Anna Kiialainen,Himika Patel,Sasha Sreckovic,Marianne Uguen,John Edwards,Zsolt Nagy,Austin G. Kulasekararaj
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.27413
IF: 13.265
2024-06-27
American Journal of Hematology
Abstract:Phase 3 randomized COMMODORE 1 trial: crovalimab vs eculizumab in complement inhibitor‐experienced patients with PNH. Crovalimab, a novel C5 inhibitor, allows for low‐volume, every‐4‐ week, subcutaneous self‐administration. COMMODORE 1 (NCT04432584) is a phase 3, global, randomized trial evaluating crovalimab versus eculizumab in C5 inhibitor‐experienced patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). Adults with lactate dehydrogenase ≤1.5 × upper limit of normal and receiving approved eculizumab doses for ≥24 weeks were randomized 1:1 to receive crovalimab (weight‐based tiered dosing) or continue eculizumab. The original primary study objective was efficacy; however, given the evolving treatment landscape, target recruitment was not met, and all efficacy endpoints became exploratory, with safety as the new primary objective. Exploratory efficacy endpoints included transfusion avoidance, hemolysis control, breakthrough hemolysis, hemoglobin stabilization, FACIT‐Fatigue score, and patient preference (crovalimab vs. eculizumab). Eighty‐nine patients were randomized (45 to crovalimab; 44 to eculizumab). During the 24‐week primary treatment period, adverse events (AEs) occurred in 77% of patients receiving crovalimab and 67% receiving eculizumab. No AEs led to treatment withdrawal or death, and no meningococcal infections occurred. 16% of crovalimab‐treated patients had transient immune complex reactions (also known as Type III hypersensitivity events), an expected risk when switching between C5 inhibitors that bind to different C5 epitopes; most were mild/moderate and all resolved without treatment modification. Crovalimab‐treated patients had sustained terminal complement activity inhibition, maintained disease control, and 85% preferred crovalimab over eculizumab. Together with phase 3 COMMODORE 2 results in complement inhibitor‐naive patients, these data support crovalimab's favorable benefit–risk profile. Crovalimab is a new C5 inhibitor for PNH that is potentially less burdensome than existing therapies for this lifelong disease.
hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?