Abstract:Introduction: Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is an indolent B-cell malignancy comprising >10% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. The Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib was the first systemic therapy approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory MZL, based on a Phase II study reporting an objective response rate (ORR) of 48% (3% complete responses [CR]) and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 14.2 months (mo) in 60 pts (Noy A et al. Blood 2017). Copanlisib is a pan-class I phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor with potent activity against the α and δ isoforms, approved for the treatment of relapsed follicular lymphoma in pts who have received ≥2 prior systemic therapies. In May 2019, the FDA granted Breakthrough Therapy designation for copanlisib for adults with MZL who have received ≥2 prior systemic therapies. We report results from 23 heavily pretreated pts with relapsed or refractory MZL treated with copanlisib from the Phase II CHRONOS-1 study (NCT01660451; Part B). Methods: Pts enrolled in the open-label, single-arm CHRONOS-1 trial with histologically confirmed MZL who had relapsed after or were refractory to ≥2 prior systemic therapies, including rituximab and an alkylating agent, were included in the analysis. Copanlisib 60 mg was administered via a 1-hour i.v. infusion on an intermittent schedule of days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle and continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary efficacy endpoint was ORR, defined as the proportion of pts who had CR or partial response as best response after ≥4 cycles, per independent assessment (Cheson BD et al. J Clin Oncol 2007). Secondary efficacy endpoints included duration of response (DoR), PFS, and overall survival (OS). Adverse events (AEs) were reported using MedDRA (v.20.1). The last pt was enrolled in Feb 2016, with an initial data cut-off of June 2016. The long-term follow-up reported here is based on a data cut-off of Feb 2018. Results: Of the 23 MZL pts enrolled, 15 (65%) had nodal MZL, 4 (17%) had mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, and 4 (17%) had splenic MZL. Pts had a median age of 69 years (range 39-81) and a median of 3 (range 2-9) prior systemic therapies; 48% were refractory to the last regimen and 44% were refractory to rituximab. As of Feb 2018, the median duration of copanlisib treatment was 23 weeks (range 1-191), and pts received a median of 5.8 cycles of treatment. Overall, 18 pts achieved an objective response (ORR 78%); CRs were observed in 3 (13%) pts, all with splenic MZL (3/4 pts). ORRs were 87% (13/15 pts) in nodal MZL, 75% (3/4 pts) in splenic MZL, and 50% (2/4 pts) in MALT MZL. Overall median DoR was 17.4 mo (range 0-37.6), with an estimated 45% in response after 2 years (Figure A) and a median DoR of 16.1 mo (range 0-37.6) in nodal MZL. Median PFS was 24.1 mo (range 0-41.1) (Figure B). Median OS was not reached (range 0.2-44.1) and estimated survival rate at 720 days was 83%. Of the 18 responding pts, median PFS was 24.2 mo (range 2.3-41.1); once remission was achieved, median DoR was 17.4 mo (range 0-37.6), with ~45% in remission beyond 2 years. The most common treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs; all grade/grade 3+) were fatigue (52.2%/13.0%), hyperglycemia (47.8%/39.1%), and diarrhea (47.8%/13.0% all grade 3). Five pts had AEs leading to a dose reduction. The most common drug-related TEAEs were hyperglycemia (47.8%/39.1%), hypertension (43.5%/39.1% all grade 3), diarrhea (26.1%/13.0% all grade 3), and neutropenia (26.1%/8.7%). Hyperglycemia and hypertension were infusion related and were transient and manageable. Laboratory toxicities of interest were principally grade 1, including increased aspartate transaminase (31.8% all grade/22.7% grade 1) and increased alanine transaminase (27.3%/13.6%). No grade 5 TEAEs were reported. Tumor gene expression analysis from a subset of MZL pts demonstrated anti-tumor activity of copanlisib in MZL tumors characterized by PI3K pathway activation and/or B-cell receptor signaling. Conclusions: Copanlisib demonstrated a promising ORR of 78% (CR 13%) and a manageable safety profile in pts with MZL who had received ≥2 prior systemic therapies. Responses were durable, with a median DoR of 17.4 mo and PFS of 24.1 mo, exceeding previous benchmarks. Phase III studies are underway to confirm the efficacy and safety of copanlisib in combination with other therapies in pts with indolent lymphoma, including MZL. Disclosures Dreyling: Acerta: Other: Scientific advisory board; Bayer: Other: Scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Other: Scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Other: Scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Other: Scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Other: Scientific advisory board, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Scientific advisory board; Roche: Other: Scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Other: Scientific advisory board. Panayiotidis:Bayer: Other: Support of clinical trial. Follows:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AZ: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Özcan:Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Other: Travel; Janssen: Research Funding, Travel; AbbVie: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Other: Travel, Research Funding; Archigen: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Jazz: Other: Travel; Sanofi: Other: Travel; Abdi Ibrahim: Other: Travel. Santoro:Arqule: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Abb-Vie: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Lilly: Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Speakers Bureau; Eisai: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy. Stevens:Astellas: Consultancy. Hiemeyer:Bayer AG: Employment. Liu:Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Garcia-Vargas:Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Childs:Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Zinzani:Verastem: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy; Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Eusapharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Copanlisib received U.S. FDA Breakthrough Designation in May 2019 for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed marginal zone lymphoma who have received at least 2 prior therapies, though copanlisib is not currently approved for this indication.

Abstract:Abstract Introduction: Copanlisib plus rituximab (C+R) was recently shown to be superior to placebo plus rituximab (P+R) in prolonging progression-free survival in patients with relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) (hazard ratio 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39, 0.69; 1-sided p=0.000002; Matasar et al. Lancet Oncology 2021). The objective response rate and complete response (CR) rates were also significantly higher in the C+R arm (81% and 34%, respectively) vs the P+R arm (48% and 15%, respectively). Whereas R administration was limited (odd cycles 1 to 9), C was administered until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients who discontinued then entered active follow-up and had CT scans on a regular schedule. This included a number of patients with objective responses who stopped treatment prior to documented progression. To provide insight on the optimal treatment duration for patients achieving a best overall response of partial response (PR) or CR with C+R treatment, we compare the duration of response (DoR) in patients after stopping treatment vs DoR in those who remained on treatment. Methods: CHRONOS-3 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III study. Patients with iNHL (follicular lymphoma grades 1-3a, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia, marginal zone lymphoma, small lymphocytic lymphoma) who relapsed after the last R-containing regimen and were progression-free and treatment-free for ≥12 months (mo) after the last R-containing regimen, or for >6 mo if unwilling/unfit to receive chemotherapy, were randomized 2:1 to receive C+R or P+R. C 60 mg flat dose was given via a 1-h i.v. infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 (28-day cycle) and continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. R 375 mg/m 2 was given i.v. on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 during cycle 1 and on day 1 of cycles 3, 5, 7, and 9. Tumors were assessed by CT or MRI at screening and every 8 weeks during year 1, every 12 weeks during year 2, and every 24 weeks during year 3 and onwards. Response was assessed by blinded central review. DoR for patients with a PR or CR after stopping treatment was based on either the date of the last dose or the date of first response for patients whose scans occurred after stopping treatment. Results: As of August 31, 2020, 307 patients were randomized to C+R and 151 patients to P+R. In the C+R arm, 104 patients (34%) had a best overall response of CR, 137 patients (45%) had a PR, 5 patients (2%) had a minor response, and 2 patients (0.7%) had a very good partial response. Overall, median DoR was 20.4 mo (95% CI 17.0, 30.8) with a median time to first objective response of 1.8 mo and a median time to CR of 3.7 mo. Patients with a CR did not reach median DoR; 80% estimated response rate at 12 mo and 69% at 24 mo. Patients with a PR had a median DoR of 12.3 mo (95% CI 10.2, 15.3). A total of 57 patients with a CR and 65 patients with a PR stopped treatment before progression, with 71/122 (58%) patients discontinuing due to an adverse event. Median DoR before treatment discontinuation was 3.8 mo for patients with a CR and 1.7 mo for patients with a PR. Of patients with objective responses stopping treatment before progression, the total median DoR was 18.7 mo (95% CI 10.0, not evaluable) for those with a CR (n=57) and 5.3 mo (95% CI 2.9, 8.2) for those with a PR (n=65; Figure 1A). In contrast, of patients with objective responses who remained on treatment until progression or until the time of database lock, the median DoR was not reached for those with a CR (n=47; 89% estimated response rate at both 12 and 24 mo; Figure 1B) and the median DoR was 14.8 mo (95% CI 9.4, 17.2) for those with a PR (n=72; Figure 1B). Conclusions: For patients with iNHL treated with C+R and achieving a CR, sustained responses were seen in some patients upon cessation of treatment before disease progression, although the DoR was longer for patients with a CR who remained on treatment. The DoR for those achieving a PR was markedly less upon cessation of treatment than for patients who remained on treatment. Together, these results support the trial design of treatment to progression, but further suggest that discontinuation of treatment for patients with relapsed iNHL treated with C+R may be an option for some patients achieving a CR. Analysis of factors associated with a sustained CR upon stopping treatment are ongoing. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Matasar: Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Rocket Medical: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: Current Employment; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; IGM Biosciences: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; ImmunoVaccine Technologies: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Özcan: AbbVie: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Archigen Biotech: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: Travel support; Abdi İbrahim: Other: Financial relationships; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Financial relationships; Sanofi: Other: Financial relationships. Jurczak: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Celtrion, Celgene, Debbiopharm, Epizyme, Incyte, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Merck, Mei Pharma, Morphosys, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Sandoz, Takeda, TG Therapeutics, Pharmacyclics, Affirmed, Gilead Sciences, Nordic Nanovecto: Research Funding; AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Sandoz, Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; European Medicines Agency, Sandoz-Novartis, Janssen China R&D, BeiGene, Epizyme, Acerta, AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology: Current Employment; Jagiellonian University: Ended employment in the past 24 months. Mongay Soler: Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Current Employment. Cao: Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Current Employment. Hiemeyer: Bayer AG: Current Employment. Childs: Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Current Employment. Zinzani: ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; ImmuneDesign: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

826O Copanlisib Plus Rituximab Vs Placebo Plus Rituximab in Patients (pts) with Relapsed Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL) Treated in the Phase III CHRONOS-3 Trial

CHRONOS‐3: RANDOMIZED PHASE III STUDY OF COPANLISIB PLUS RITUXIMAB VS RITUXIMAB/PLACEBO IN RELAPSED INDOLENT NON‐HODGKIN LYMPHOMA (INHL)

Abstract CT001: CHRONOS-3: Randomized Phase III Study of Copanlisib Plus Rituximab Vs Rituximab/placebo in Relapsed Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (Inhl)

Copanlisib + rituximab versus rituximab + placebo in patients with relapsed follicular (FL) or marginal zone lymphoma (MZL): Subset analysis from the phase III CHRONOS-3 trial.

Copanlisib plus rituximab versus placebo plus rituximab in patients with relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (CHRONOS-3): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

CHRONOS-4: phase 3 study of copanlisib plus rituximab-based immunochemotherapy in relapsed indolent B-cell lymphoma

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Copanlisib in Multiply Relapsed or Refractory Patients with Marginal Zone Lymphoma

A phase II study of the PI3K inhibitor copanlisib in combination with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab for patients with marginal zone lymphoma: treatment rationale and protocol design of the COUP-1 trial

Phase Ib of Copanlisib in Combination with Ibrutinib in Recurrent/Refractory Primary CNS Lymphoma (PCNSL)

Copanlisib in Combination with Nivolumab in Subjects with Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and Primary Mediastinal Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Phase II Study

Long‐term safety and efficacy of the PI3K inhibitor copanlisib in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent lymphoma: 2‐year follow‐up of the CHRONOS‐1 study

Duration of Objective Responses for Patients with Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Discontinuing Treatment before Progression: Analysis from the Phase III Chronos-3 Trial Comparing Copanlisib Plus Rituximab with Placebo Plus Rituximab

Copanlisib in Combination with Nivolumab in Subjects with Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and Primary Mediastinal Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Phase 2 Study

A Phase I Trial of PI3Kαδ Inhibitor Copanlisib in Combination with Nivolumab in Patients with Richter's Transformation (RT) or Transformed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (tNHL)

Copanlisib for the Treatment of Malignant Lymphoma: Clinical Experience and Future Perspectives

Abstract CT007: Phase 1/2 trial of copanlisib in combination with nivolumab for microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC)

Model‐Based Benefit/Risk Analysis for the Copanlisib Intermittent Dosing Regimen

Comparison of Zuberitamab Plus CHOP Versus Rituximab Plus CHOP for the Treatment of Drug-Naïve Patients Diagnosed with CD20-positive Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma: a Phase 3 Trial

Phase II Study of Copanlisib in Patients With Tumors With PIK3CA Mutations: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol Z1F

Rituximab Plus Cladribine Versus R-CHOP in Frontline Management of Marginal Zone Lymphoma in China: a Propensity-Score Matched Multicenter Study