Stonehenge revisited: A geochemical approach to interpreting the geographical source of sarsen stone #58

Ronald G. V. Hancock,Michael P. Gorton,William C. Mahaney,Suzanne Aufreiter,Kostalena Michelaki
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12999
IF: 1.915
2024-05-31
Archaeometry
Abstract:It is tempting in material sourcing analyses to treat chemical data primarily as numbers to be sorted, while disregarding their interlinked geochemistries. Consideration of geochemistry, however, often leads to the drawing of more nuanced and reliable conclusions. In this paper we re‐examine data published in 2020, related to the sourcing of stone #58 at Stonehenge, paying attention to geochemistry. We question the potential single‐source interpretation of these data and suggest instead that three to six sources cannot be ruled out.
geosciences, multidisciplinary,chemistry, analytical, inorganic & nuclear
What problem does this paper attempt to address?