Abstract:Detrital geochronology, generally focused on zircon only, is widely used not only to obtain qualitative information on source areas but also in quantitative provenance analysis aimed at calculating sediment yields and erosion rates under the assumption that age spectra broadly reflect the proportions of areal exposures of source rocks. The principal aim of this article is to put this assumption to test. The Tibetan Plateau and Himalayan belt, in which the age of magmatic and metamorphic events has been accurately determined through decades of geological and geochronological studies, represent an excellent natural laboratory for provenance analysis. In this study, we focus on sand carried by three major Tibetan rivers - including the largest tributaries of the Yarlung Tsangpo draining either the Lhasa block or the Himalaya exclusively - and couple classical petrographic and heavy-mineral analyses with geochronological and geochemical fingerprinting of detrital zircon, monazite, titanite, and rutile as witnesses of episodes of crustal growth in their catchment. Zircon, rutile, monazite, and titanite provide different responses to magmatic and metamorphic events and are highly to moderately durable minerals that can be preserved in ancient sandstones, thus representing precious tracers in provenance analysis. Our results show that largely euhedral zircon and titanite grains in Lhasa River sand reflect the multiple magmatic events that affected the Lhasa block through the Mesozoic and Cenozoic, and together with detrital monazite and rutile highlight post-collisional metamorphic events in the Nyainqentanglha Range. Mostly rounded detrital minerals generated in the Nianchu and Pumchu catchments are instead largely recycled from Tethys Himalayan sedimentary rocks, but young ages of monazite and titanite grains reflect the widespread Miocene thermal event associated with leucogranite intrusions both at the top of the Greater Himalayan metamorphic unit and in Northern Himalayan gneiss domes. The geochemical signature of most rutile grains in all studied samples indicates ultimate provenance from metapelites. Most important, the age spectra of different datable detrital minerals reflect poorly and in very different proportions the areal exposure of source-rock lithologies (and in the Lhasa River catchment also the areal exposure of granitoids of different age). We conclude that, although detrital geochronology does provide essential information in qualitative provenance reconstructions, the age distributions of single minerals cannot be reliably converted in terms of proportional sediment yield, and thus cannot be used to calculate sediment budgets or trace erosion rates unless fertility bias is accurately quantified and taken into due account.

Utilizing Geochemical Analysis for Provenance Determination in Sedimentary Systems

Sediment Geochemistry As A Provenance Indicator: Unravelling the Cryptic Signatures of Polycyclic Sources, Climate Change, Tectonism and Volcanism

Integrating Petrography and Geochemistry Data for Provenance and Palaeotectonic Interpretation of a Sedimentary Deposit

Geochemical trends in sedimentary environments using PCA approach

Sand Provenance in the Gurbantunggut Desert, Northern China

Applications of Geochemistry and Geochronology of Accessory Minerals in Sandstone to Provenance Analysis

Identification of Sediment Provenance in the South Yellow Sea Using Detrital Amphibole Geochemistry

The effects of weathering and sediment source mixing on whole-rock geochemical provenance studies, Cook Inlet forearc basin, south-central Alaska, USA

How Faithfully Do the Geochronological and Geochemical Signatures of Detrital Zircon, Titanite, Rutile and Monazite Record Magmatic and Metamorphic Events? A Case Study from the Himalaya and Tibet

Geochemical Split Among the Suspended and Mud Sediments in the Nethravati River: Insights to Compositional Similarity of Peninsular Gneiss and the Deccan Basalt Derived Sediments, and Its Implications on Tracing the Provenance in the Indian Ocean

Grain-size dependence of sediment composition and environmental bias in provenance studies

Integrating Stratigraphic Modelling, Inversion Analysis, and Shelf‐margin Records to Guide Provenance Analysis: an Example from the Cretaceous Colville Basin, Arctic Alaska

An Innovative Graphical Approach for Analyzing Detrital Zircon Geochronology Data in Provenance Analysis

Advances in Sediment Geochemistry and Chemostratigraphy for Reservoir Characterization

Provenance of mesozoic sandstones in the Saurashtra Basin using heavy minerals geochemistry and geochronology: Implications for paleogeographic reconstruction in Western India

An effective geochemical method to identify provenance from sources with similar geology: A case study from Ordos Basin, China

Petrology and multimineral fingerprinting of modern sand generated from a dissected magmatic arc (Lhasa River, Tibet)

Multivariate statistical "unmixing" of Indian and Pacific Ocean sediment provenance

Quantifying Sediment Provenance Using Multiple Composite Fingerprints in a Small Watershed in Oklahoma

Application of Detrital Apatite U-Pb Geochronology and Trace Elements for Provenance Analysis,Insights from a Study on the Yarlung River Sand

Discriminating Sediment Archives and Sedimentary Processes in the Arid Endorheic Ejina Basin, NW China Using a Robust Geochemical Approach