Abstract:Detrital geochronology, generally focused on zircon only, is widely used not only to obtain qualitative information on source areas but also in quantitative provenance analysis aimed at calculating sediment yields and erosion rates under the assumption that age spectra broadly reflect the proportions of areal exposures of source rocks. The principal aim of this article is to put this assumption to test. The Tibetan Plateau and Himalayan belt, in which the age of magmatic and metamorphic events has been accurately determined through decades of geological and geochronological studies, represent an excellent natural laboratory for provenance analysis. In this study, we focus on sand carried by three major Tibetan rivers - including the largest tributaries of the Yarlung Tsangpo draining either the Lhasa block or the Himalaya exclusively - and couple classical petrographic and heavy-mineral analyses with geochronological and geochemical fingerprinting of detrital zircon, monazite, titanite, and rutile as witnesses of episodes of crustal growth in their catchment. Zircon, rutile, monazite, and titanite provide different responses to magmatic and metamorphic events and are highly to moderately durable minerals that can be preserved in ancient sandstones, thus representing precious tracers in provenance analysis. Our results show that largely euhedral zircon and titanite grains in Lhasa River sand reflect the multiple magmatic events that affected the Lhasa block through the Mesozoic and Cenozoic, and together with detrital monazite and rutile highlight post-collisional metamorphic events in the Nyainqentanglha Range. Mostly rounded detrital minerals generated in the Nianchu and Pumchu catchments are instead largely recycled from Tethys Himalayan sedimentary rocks, but young ages of monazite and titanite grains reflect the widespread Miocene thermal event associated with leucogranite intrusions both at the top of the Greater Himalayan metamorphic unit and in Northern Himalayan gneiss domes. The geochemical signature of most rutile grains in all studied samples indicates ultimate provenance from metapelites. Most important, the age spectra of different datable detrital minerals reflect poorly and in very different proportions the areal exposure of source-rock lithologies (and in the Lhasa River catchment also the areal exposure of granitoids of different age). We conclude that, although detrital geochronology does provide essential information in qualitative provenance reconstructions, the age distributions of single minerals cannot be reliably converted in terms of proportional sediment yield, and thus cannot be used to calculate sediment budgets or trace erosion rates unless fertility bias is accurately quantified and taken into due account.

Applications of Geochemistry and Geochronology of Accessory Minerals in Sandstone to Provenance Analysis

Site-Directed and In-situ Dating Microbeam Techniques and Crystal Chemistry Microanalysis for U-Th-Pb Bearing Accesory Minerals

Application of Detrital Apatite U-Pb Geochronology and Trace Elements for Provenance Analysis,Insights from a Study on the Yarlung River Sand

Detrital Rutile： A Sediment Provenance Indicator

How Faithfully Do the Geochronological and Geochemical Signatures of Detrital Zircon, Titanite, Rutile and Monazite Record Magmatic and Metamorphic Events? A Case Study from the Himalaya and Tibet

Sand Provenance in the Gurbantunggut Desert, Northern China

Utilizing Geochemical Analysis for Provenance Determination in Sedimentary Systems

Sediment Geochemistry As A Provenance Indicator: Unravelling the Cryptic Signatures of Polycyclic Sources, Climate Change, Tectonism and Volcanism

Petrology and multimineral fingerprinting of modern sand generated from a dissected magmatic arc (Lhasa River, Tibet)

Grain Textural Bias in Detrital Single-Mineral Provenance Studies

A misunderstanding in provenance analysis:Sand changes of mineral, roundness,and size in flowing-water transportation

An Innovative Graphical Approach for Analyzing Detrital Zircon Geochronology Data in Provenance Analysis

Provenance Analysis of the Ordovician Sandstones in Northern Sonid Left Banner Area of Inner Mongolia and Its Geological Significance

Identification of Sediment Provenance in the South Yellow Sea Using Detrital Amphibole Geochemistry

Provenance of Tertiary Sandstone in the Northern Qaidam Basin, Northeastern Tibetan Plateau: Integration of Framework Petrography, Heavy Mineral Analysis and Mineral Chemistry

Discriminating Qiangtang, Lhasa, and Himalayan Sediment Sources in the Tibetan Plateau by Detrital-Zircon U-Pb Age and Hf Isotope Facies

Limitations of provenance diagnoses and maximum‐depositional‐age constraints based on detrital‐zircon geochronology: the fertility bias

Integrating Petrography and Geochemistry Data for Provenance and Palaeotectonic Interpretation of a Sedimentary Deposit

Integrated Methodology for Determining Provenance of Detrital Quartz Using Optical Petrographic Microscopy and Cathodoluminescence (CL) Properties

Detrital Muscovite 40ar/39ar Geochronology and Provenance of Cenozoic Deposits in the Qaidam Basin, Northern Tibetan Plateau and Comparison with Detrital Zircon and Apatite Records

Provenance Discrimination of Paleogene Clastic Rock (Shaxi Region, Qaidam Basin): Constraints from Heavy Minerals, and Rare-Earth-Element Geochemistry