Abstract:Background Left ventricular (LV) remodeling in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) is believed to be reversible after pressure overload relieve, as provided by both surgical (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement. However, LV reverse remodeling (RR) is far from uniform in patients with AS and the same clinical indication for treatment. Aim To determine the prevalence and imaging predictors of LV RR after SAVR in patients with severe symptomatic AS. Methods single-center, prospective cohort study enrolling 119 patients with severe symptomatic AS (age 71±8y, 49% male; mean transaortic gradient 62±18mmHg, mean indexed aortic valve area (AVAi) 0.40±0.10 cm2/m2, mean LV ejection fraction by TTE 58±9%), with no previous history of ischemic cardiomyopathy, undergoing SAVR between 2019 and 2022. All patients underwent serial imaging assessment beyond clinical characterization (transthoracic echocardiogram – TTE, and 1.5T cardiac magnetic resonance - CMR) prior to surgery and at the 3rd to 6th month post-SAVR. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) for myocardial fibrosis quantification (Masson ́s Trichrome histochemistry) was performed during SAVR. LV RR was defined when in presence of at least one of the imaging criteria: > 15% reduction in LV end-diastolic indexed volume (LVEDV) by CMR; > 15% reduction in LV indexed mass (LVM) by CMR; > 15% reduction in LV geometric remodeling by CMR; >10% increase in LV ejection fraction (LVEF) either from TTE or CMR; > 50% increase in global longitudinal strain (GLS) at TTE. Clinical, imaging and histology derived data were compared in patients with post-SAVR LV RR and for each of the defined criteria. Results 107 patients (90%) met at least one criteria of LV RR. Morphological criteria were more prevalent than LV functional improvement after SAVR (Figure 1). In patients who met at least one criteria of LV RR, no differences were found between NT- proBNP, LV tissue characterization (by CMR) or myocardial fibrosis at EMB. Yet, those with LV RR had significantly smaller preoperative AVAi (0.4±0.9 vs 0.5±0.9 cm2/m2, p=0.007) and higher mean valvular gradients (62±18 vs 49±12 mmHg, p=0.017). Considering individual LV RR criteria, patients with higher NT-proBNP levels met LVEF and morphological (LVEDV and LVM) LV RR criteria (p=0.027, p=0.016 and p= 0.003, respectively). Patients with higher % of late gadolinium enhancement on pre-operative CMR [7.8 (IQR 2.5-11.3) vs. 1.6 (IQR 0-5.2)%, p=0.017] had significant GLS improvement after SAVR. Conclusion In a cohort of patients with classical severe, symptomatic AS, LV RR is common after SAVR, occurring in almost 9 out of every 10 patients. Both indexes of worse valve narrowing and pre-operative LV adaptation are associated with favorable RR after surgery. This underlines the benefits of a timely intervention even in patients with more advanced disease.

Longitudinal Assessment of Left Atrial Remodeling in Patients With Chronic Severe Aortic Regurgitation

Abstract 18806: How Well Does Left Atrial Remodeling Predict Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Severe Aortic Regurgitation?

Left ventricular reverse remodeling after aortic valve replacement or repair in bicuspid aortic valve with moderate or greater aortic regurgitation

Prognostic value of fully-automated left atrial strain in patients with asymptomatic chronic severe aortic regurgitation

Prognostic Implications of Left Atrial Strain in Bicuspid Aortic Valve With Chronic Aortic Regurgitation

Left ventricle reverse remodeling in chronic aortic regurgitation patients with dilated ventricle after aortic valve replacement

Prognostic impact of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in atrial mitral regurgitation

From Valvular to Myocardial Dysfunction

Prognostic value of left ventricular and left atrial strain imaging in moderate to severe aortic stenosis: Insights from an Asian population

Left Atrial Remodeling in Response to Aortic Valve Replacement: Pathophysiology and Myocardial Strain Analysis

Increased left ventricular remodelling index in paradoxical low-flow severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction compared to normal-flow severe aortic stenosis

Cardiac magnetic resonance patterns of left ventricular remodeling in patients with severe aortic stenosis referred to surgical aortic valve replacement

Left atrial strain is associated with left ventricular remodeling in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Atrial Dysfunction in Significant Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation: Phenotypes and Prognostic Implications

The Predictive Value of Left Atrial Strain Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation on Anatomical and Functional Reverse Remodeling in a Multi-Modality Study

Prognostic value of left atrial reverse remodelling in patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure

Short-term adverse remodeling progression in asymptomatic aortic stenosis

Predictors of LV reverse remodeling after SAVR: insights from a prospective TTE and CMR study in patients with severe aortic stenosis

Left atrial volume assessed by echocardiography identifies patients with high risk of adverse outcome after acute myocardial infarction

Left atrial strain quantified after myocardial infarction is associated with early left ventricular remodeling

Left atrial strain in acute heart failure: clinical and prognostic insights