Abstract:Chromosome congression and alignment on the metaphase plate involves lateral and microtubule plus-end interactions with the kinetochore. Here we take advantage of our ability to efficiently generate a GFP-marked acentric X chromosome fragment in Drosophila neuroblasts to identify forces acting on chromosome arms that drive congression and alignment. We find acentrics efficiently align on the metaphase plate, often more rapidly than kinetochore-bearing chromosomes. Unlike intact chromosomes, the paired sister acentrics oscillate as they move to and reside on the metaphase plate in a plane distinct and significantly further from the main mass of intact chromosomes. Consequently, at anaphase onset acentrics are oriented either parallel or perpendicular to the spindle. Parallel-oriented sisters separate by sliding while those oriented perpendicularly separate via unzipping. This oscillation, together with the fact that in monopolar spindles acentrics are rapidly shunted away from the poles, indicates that distributed plus-end directed forces are primarily responsible for acentric migration. This conclusion is supported by the observation that reduction of EB1 preferentially disrupts acentric alignment. In addition, reduction of Klp3a activity, a gene required for the establishment of pole-to-pole microtubules, preferentially disrupts acentric alignment. Taken together these studies suggest that plus-end forces mediated by the outer pole-to-pole microtubules are primarily responsible for acentric metaphase alignment. Surprisingly, we find that a small fraction of sister acentrics are anti-parallel aligned indicating that the kinetochore is required to ensure parallel alignment of sister chromatids. Finally, we find induction of acentric chromosome fragments results in a global reorganization of the congressed chromosomes into a torus configuration.

Artificial kinetochore beads establish a biorientation-like state in the spindle

Tethering NDC80-NUF2 to microparticles is sufficient to enable their biorientation in the spindle

Regulation of A Dynamic Interaction Between Two Microtubule-Binding Proteins, Eb1 and Tip150, by the Mitotic P300/Cbp-Associated Factor (pcaf) Orchestrates Kinetochore Microtubule Plasticity and Chromosome Stability During Mitosis

Kinetochore-microtubule error correction for biorientation: lessons from yeast

Kinetochores promote timely spindle bipolarization to prevent microtubule attachment errors in oocytes

Centromere-localized Aurora B Kinase is Required for the Fidelity of Chromosome Segregation.

Kinetochores grip microtubules with directionally asymmetric strength

Augmin-mediated amplification of long-lived spindle microtubules directs plus-ends to kinetochores

Kinetochore-independent Chromosome Poleward Movement During Anaphase of Meiosis II in Mouse Eggs.

Establishing correct kinetochore-microtubule attachments in mitosis and meiosis.

Modeling and mechanical perturbations reveal how spatially regulated anchorage gives rise to spatially distinct mechanics across the mammalian spindle

CENP-C-Mis12 complex establishes a regulatory loop through Aurora B for chromosome segregation

Structure of the human outer kinetochore KMN network complex

Aurora B kinase activity–dependent and –independent functions of the chromosomal passenger complex in regulating sister chromatid cohesion

Acentric chromosome congression and alignment on the metaphase plate occur via kinetochore-independent forces

Microtubule pivoting driven by spindle elongation rescues polar chromosomes to ensure faithful mitosis

CCDC74A/B are K-fiber crosslinkers required for chromosomal alignment

Centromere pairing enables correct segregation of meiotic chromosomes

Higher-order protein assembly controls kinetochore formation

Aurora B promotes the CENP-T–CENP-W interaction to guide accurate chromosome segregation in mitosis

The centromere comes into focus: from CENP-A nucleosomes to kinetochore connections with the spindle