Abstract:The primary constriction site of the M-phase chromosome is an established marker for the kinetochore position, often used to determine the karyotype of each species. Underlying this observation is the concept that the kinetochore is spatially linked with the pericentromere where sister-chromatids are most tightly cohered. Here, we found an unconventional pericentromere specification with sister chromatids mainly cohered at a chromosome end, spatially separated from the kinetochore in Peromyscus mouse oocytes. This distal locus enriched cohesin protectors, such as the Chromosomal Passenger Complex (CPC) and PP2A, at a higher level compared to its centromere/kinetochore region, acting as the primary site for sister-chromatid cohesion. Chromosomes with the distal cohesion site exhibited enhanced cohesin protection at anaphase I compared to those without it, implying that these distal cohesion sites may have evolved to ensure sister-chromatid cohesion during meiosis. In contrast, mitotic cells enriched CPC only near the kinetochore and the distal locus was not cohered between sister chromatids, suggesting a meiosis-specific mechanism to protect cohesin at this distal locus. We found that this distal locus corresponds to an additional centromeric satellite block, located far apart from the centromeric satellite block that builds the kinetochore. Several Peromyscus species carry chromosomes with two such centromeric satellite blocks. Analyses on three Peromyscus species revealed that the internal satellite consistently assembles the kinetochore in both mitosis and meiosis, whereas the distal satellite selectively enriches cohesin protectors in meiosis to promote sister-chromatid cohesion at that site. Thus, our study demonstrates that pericentromere specification is remarkably flexible and can control chromosome segregation in a cell-type and context dependent manner.

Kinetochore-independent Chromosome Poleward Movement During Anaphase of Meiosis II in Mouse Eggs.

Long-Range Repulsion Between Chromosomes in Mammalian Oocyte Spindles

The Dynamics and Functions of Cytoskeleton During Meiotic Resumption Induced by Parthenogenetic Activation in Mouse Oocytes

Revisiting Internet AS-level Topology Discovery

Chromosome position at the spindle equator is regulated by chromokinesin and a bipolar microtubule array

Multiple motors cooperate to establish and maintain acentrosomal spindle bipolarity in C. elegans oocyte meiosis

Artificial kinetochore beads establish a biorientation-like state in the spindle

Asymmetric positioning and organization of the meiotic spindle of mouse oocytes requires CDC42 function.

Spindle assembly in the absence of chromosomes in mouse oocytes.

Spindle Tubulin and MTOC Asymmetries May Explain Meiotic Drive in Oocytes

Isolation and manipulation of meiotic spindles from mouse oocytes reveals migration regulated by pulling force during asymmetric division

Microtubule Assembly and Pole Coalescence: Early Steps in C. elegans Oocyte Meiosis I Spindle Assembly

Regulation of Intracellular MEK1/2 Translocation in Mouse Oocytes: Cytoplasmic Dynein/dynactin-Mediated Poleward Transport and Cyclin B Degradation-Dependent Release from Spindle Poles.

Hydrodynamic mechanism for stable spindle positioning in meiosis II oocytes

Spindle morphology changes between meiosis and mitosis driven by CK2 regulation of the Ran pathway

Kinetochore dynein is required for chromosome motion and congression independent of the spindle checkpoint.

Meiotic Spindle Assembly in a Mouse Oocyte

Extranuclear Structural Components that Mediate Dynamic Chromosome Movements in Yeast Meiosis

A liquid-like spindle domain promotes acentrosomal spindle assembly in mammalian oocytes

Meiosis-specific decoupling of the pericentromere from the kinetochore