Effect of Access Cavities and Canal Enlargement on Biomechanics of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Finite Element Analysis

Qian Wang,Yuxuan Liu,Zhihui Wang,Tianru Yang,Ye Liang,Zhengrong Gao,Changyun Fang,Yiyi Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.013
IF: 4.422
2020-10-01
Journal of Endodontics
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Introduction</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of access cavities and tapers of canal preparations on fracture resistance of endodontically treated first molar by finite element method (FEM) and Weibull ananlysis.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>Based on the micro-computed tomographic data of maxillary first molar, the models of endodontically treated teeth with conservative endodontic cavity (CEC), traditional endodontic cavity (TEC) and 4 tapers of canal preparations (0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08) were created. Four static loads (800 N in total) were applied vertically to the contact points. The stress distributions of maximum principal stress were record and analyzed. Weibull analysis was performed to analyze the failure risk in enamel and dentin.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>The stress distributions of maximum principal stress on occlusal surfaces were similar. In cervical region, the tensile stress was mainly concentrated on mesiobuccal root and root furcation. The finite element analysis and Weibull analysis showed that CEC significantly reduced the maximum principal stress in cervical region and the failure probability, compared with TEC. No significant difference was detected among tapers of prepared canals.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>Preserving coronal dentin by using conservative endodontic cavity significantly reduced the concentration of tensile stress and the failure probability of dentin. While the maximum principal stress and failure probability were less affected by taper of canal preparation.</p>
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? This paper aims to study the influence of the access cavity for root - canal - treated teeth and root - canal enlargement on the biomechanical properties of teeth. In particular, it evaluates the influence of different access cavity designs and root - canal preparation tapers on the fracture resistance and failure probability of teeth through finite element analysis (FEM) and Weibull analysis. Specifically, the authors hope to solve the problems in the following aspects: 1. **Evaluate the influence of access cavity design**: - Compare the influence of conservative endodontic access cavity (CEC) and traditional endodontic access cavity (TEC) on the stress distribution and failure risk of root - canal - treated teeth. 2. **Evaluate the influence of root - canal preparation taper**: - Research the influence of root - canal preparations with different tapers (0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08) on the stress distribution and failure risk of teeth. 3. **Combine FEM and Weibull analysis**: - Use finite element analysis to simulate stress distribution and predict the cumulative failure probability of teeth under different conditions through Weibull analysis, so as to more comprehensively understand the biomechanical behavior of teeth. ### Main conclusions - **Preserving coronal dentin significantly reduces stress concentration and failure probability**: Using a conservative endodontic access cavity (CEC) can significantly reduce the tensile stress concentration in the cervical region and furcation area, thereby reducing the failure probability of dentin. - **The taper of root - canal preparation has little influence on the failure probability**: Different tapers of root - canal preparation have no obvious influence on the maximum principal stress and failure probability. - **Key areas**: The cervical region and furcation are the key areas affecting the failure probability of root - canal - treated teeth. ### Method overview 1. **Acquisition of geometric model**: - Use micro - CT scanning to obtain a three - dimensional model of the maxillary first molar, and create two access cavity designs (CEC and TEC) and four root - canal preparation models with different tapers based on this. 2. **Finite element analysis**: - Apply a static load (800N, distributed at four contact points) and record the maximum principal stress of enamel and dentin. 3. **Weibull analysis**: - Based on the maximum principal stress data, calculate the failure probability of enamel and dentin and draw the relationship curve between the failure probability and the load. Through these methods, the authors have obtained specific influences of different access cavity designs and root - canal preparation tapers on the biomechanical properties of root - canal - treated teeth.