Biomechanical properties of different endocrown designs on endodontically treated teeth

Yuting Huang,Qian Zhang,Qianzhou Jiang,Wietske A. Fokkinga,Nico H.J. Creugers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105691
IF: 4.042
2023-01-26
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Abstract:Objective To compare the biomechanical properties of different endocrown designs on endodontically treated teeth with an extensive defect in the mesial wall using a three-dimensional finite element method (3D FEM). Methods Four finite element analysis models were designed and built up based on different endocrown configurations in a mandibular molar. One model was designed as a butt joint preparation with 2 mm occlusal thickness(control), the other three models were butt joint designs with different distances between the bottom of the mesial wall preparation and the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ): 2 mm, 1 mm and 0 mm respectively. A vertical load parallel with the longitudinal axis of the tooth and an oblique load with a 45°angle to the longitudinal axis were applied to the occlusal surfaces. The maximum Von Misses (VM) stresses and stress distribution patterns were calculated and compared. Weibull risk-of-rupture analysis was used to analyze the survival probability of the restorations and tooth in the different models. Results For the restoration, the model with a mesial wall destruction at the level of CEJ showed much higher risk of failure than other models. Overall, none of the four models showed failure. Under oblique loading, VM stress in the cement layer of the models with a mesial wall defect was higher than in the control model. In the dentin, the highest VM stresses were found in the peri-cervical dentin. The model with the endocrown at the level of CEJ showed the highest risk of failure under the oblique loading. Conclusion Under the oblique loading, with the increase of the simulated defect in the mesial wall, the peak VM stress values in the cement layer increased accordingly. In the model with a mesial wall defect up to the level of CEJ risk of failure was highest in the cervical dentin.
engineering, biomedical,materials science, biomaterials
What problem does this paper attempt to address?