A Mixed Methods Assessment of an Online Mental Health and Resilience Program for Agricultural Sector Students
Jorie Knook Nicky Stanley-Clarke Robbie Maris Amanda Hay Chris Andrews Louise Winder a Land Management and Systems,Faculty of Agribusiness and Commerce,Lincoln University,Lincoln,New Zealandb Centre of Excellence in Transformative Agribusiness,Lincoln University,Lincoln,New Zealandc School of Social Work,Massey University,Palmerston North,New Zealandd Centre for Education Policy and Equalising Opportunities,University College London,London,UKe School of Agriculture and Environment,Massey University,Palmerston North,New Zealandf Counselling and Wellbeing Team,Lincoln University,Lincoln,New Zealand
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924x.2024.2421982
2024-11-13
Journal of Agromedicine
Abstract:Financial, environmental, and socio-cultural challenges affect the mental health and wellbeing of those working and living on-farm. Education programs can help in improving mental health and overall wellbeing, but most of these programs are offered to established farmers in a face-to-face format, leading to a gap in offerings to many subgroups, including young agricultural entrants. To address these gaps, this paper assesses the value of an online mental health and resilience education program for young agricultural entrants. An explanatory sequential mixed methods approach was applied. Firstly, a quantitative survey was conducted with 172 first year agricultural tertiary students, aged 18–20, to assess the knowledge and skills gained due to program participation. Regressions and propensity score matching were used to determine the effect of program participation. Subsequently, seven interviews were conducted with program participants to provide insights into their experiences of the program. Thematic coding was applied to analyze the qualitative data. Findings from the quantitative survey show a significant increase in mental health knowledge and skills amongst program participants compared to participants in the control group. The qualitative interviews show the ability to work through the material in their own time and space, creates a safe environment for online students. Other mechanisms contributing to learning are using "normal language", a peer voice in communicating wellbeing, and building on learnings in previous education. This paper addresses a gap in literature by being the first study to evaluate online mental health education for agricultural tertiary students. It provides educators and other program designers with valuable information for future program design to support the wellbeing of young agricultural workers.
public, environmental & occupational health