Abstract:Background: A growing body of research has examined lifestyle-based interventions for dementia prevention. Specifically, health coaching interventions have been linked to decreased risk of Alzheimer disease (AD) comorbidities, such as diabetes. Despite the association, there is a lack of research examining the efficacy and perception of digital health coaching on reducing AD risk. Understanding the perceived benefits of participating in a digital health coach program is critical to ensure long-term use, including participant adherence and engagement. Objective: The purpose of this study is to examine the initial attitudes toward a digital health coaching intervention aimed at preventing cognitive decline among at-risk, rural participants. Methods: This exploratory qualitative study is part of the ongoing Digital Cognitive Multidomain Alzheimer Risk Velocity Study (DC-MARVel; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04559789), a 2-year randomized control trial examining the effects of a digital health coaching intervention on dementia risk, cognitive decline, and general health outcomes. Participants were recruited from the northwest region of Arkansas via word of mouth, email, local radio, and social media. At the time of the analysis, 103 participants randomly assigned to the health coaching group completed an average of 4 coaching sessions over a 4-month period. The intervention included asynchronous messages 1-2 times per week from their health coach that contained health education articles based on the participant's goals (eg, increase physical activity), unlimited access to their coach for questions and recommendations, and monthly meetings with their coach via videoconference or phone to discuss their goals. Participants were asked 2 open-ended questions, "What were your top 1 or 2 takeaways from your recent Health Coaching session?" and "Is there anything you would change about our Health Coaching sessions?" A thematic analysis was conducted using feedback responses from 80 participants (mean age, SD 7.6 years). Results: The following four themes emerged from participants' feedback: (1) healthy lifestyle and behavioral changes, (2) a sense of self-awareness through introspection, (3) value in coach support, and (4) a desire for a change in program format (eg, frequency). In total, 93% (n=74) of participants expressed that the intervention needed no changes. Conclusions: Initial participation in the digital cognitive health coaching intervention was well received, as evidenced by participants reporting value in goal setting and strategies for healthy lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as self-reflection on their personal lifestyle choices. Feedback about their assigned coach also offers insight into the importance of the coach-participant relationship and may serve as a significant factor in overall participant success. Given the exploratory nature of this study, more robust research is needed to elicit more information from participants about their experiences to fully understand the acceptability of the digital health coaching intervention. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04559789; https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04559789. International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.2196/31841.

Participant perspectives of an online co-design process to develop a prevention-focused mental health and well-being platform for primary producers

Translating Co-Design from Face-to-Face to Online: An Australian Primary Producer Project Conducted during COVID-19

Co-design of a personalised digital intervention to improve vegetable intake in adults living in Australian rural communities

Development and Evaluation of a Framework for Authentic Online Co-Design: Partnership-Focussed Principles-Driven Online Co-Design

Co-designing a peer-led model of delivering behavioural activation for people living with depression or low mood in Australian farming communities

Co-designing a digital mental health platform, "Momentum", with young people aged 7-17: A qualitative study

A Mixed Methods Assessment of an Online Mental Health and Resilience Program for Agricultural Sector Students

User Experience of the Co-design Research Approach in eHealth: Activity Analysis With the Course-of-Action Framework

Adaptation, Innovation and Co-Production: Meeting the Mental Wellbeing Needs of a Digital Generation

Co-producing digital mental health interventions: A systematic review

StigmaBeat: Collaborating With Rural Young People to Co-Design Films Aimed at Reducing Mental Health Stigma

Uptake and engagement of a clinically moderated digital peer support platform to support the mental well‐being older adults: a qualitative investigation

Co-Designing a Digital App to Support Young People's Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (VoiceIn): Development and Usability Study

Initial Perspectives From Rural-Residing Adults on a Digital Cognitive Health Coaching Intervention: Exploratory Qualitative Analysis

Empowering Young Women: A Qualitative Co-Design Study of a Social Media Health Promotion Programme

Co-design of digital health interventions with young people: A scoping review

Implementing a Digital Depression Prevention Program in Australian Secondary Schools: Cross-Sectional Qualitative Study

An emerging framework for digital mental health design with Indigenous young people: a scoping review of the involvement of Indigenous young people in the design and evaluation of digital mental health interventions

Accelerating implementation of adolescent digital health prevention programs: analysis of insights from Australian stakeholders

Determining the feasibility of a codesigned and personalised intervention (Veg4Me) to improve vegetable intake in young adults living in rural Australian communities: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

A design thinking‐led approach to develop a responsive feeding intervention for Australian families vulnerable to food insecurity: Eat, Learn, Grow