Abstract:Reasoning with quantifier expressions in natural language combines logical and arithmetical features, transcending strict divides between qualitative and quantitative. Our topic is this cooperation of styles as it occurs in common linguistic usage and its extension into the broader practice of natural language plus 'grassroots mathematics'.We begin with a brief review of $\mathsf {FO}(\#)$ , first-order logic with counting operators and cardinality comparisons. This system is known to be of very high complexity, and drowns out finer aspects of the combination of logic and counting. We therefore move to a small fragment that can represent numerical syllogisms and basic reasoning about comparative size: monadic first-order logic with counting, $\mathsf {MFO}(\#)$ . We provide normal forms that allow for axiomatization, determine which arithmetical notions can be defined on finite and on infinite models, and conversely, we discuss which logical notions can be defined out of purely arithmetical ones, and what sort of (non-)classical logics can be induced.Next, we investigate a series of strengthenings of $\mathsf {MFO}(\#)$ , again using normal form methods. The monadic second-order version is close, in a precise sense, to additive Presburger Arithmetic, while versions with the natural device of tuple counting take us to Diophantine equations, making the logic undecidable. We also define a system $\mathsf {ML}(\#)$ that combines basic modal logic over binary accessibility relations with counting, needed to formulate ubiquitous reasoning patterns such as the Pigeonhole Principle. We prove decidability of $\mathsf {ML}(\#)$ , and provide a new kind of bisimulation matching the expressive power of the language.As a complement to the fragment approach pursued here, we also discuss two other ways of lowering the complexity of $\mathsf {FO}(\#)$ by changing the semantics of counting in natural ways. A first approach replaces cardinalities by abstract but well-motivated values of 'mass' or other mereological aggregating notions. A second approach keeps the cardinalities but generalizes the meaning of counting to work in models that allow dependencies between variables.Finally, we return to our starting point in natural language, confronting the architecture of our formal systems with linguistic quantifier vocabulary and syntax, as well as with natural reasoning modules such as the monotonicity calculus. In addition to these encounters with formal semantics, we discuss the role of counting in semantic evaluation procedures for quantifier expressions and determine, for instance, which binary quantifiers are computable by finite 'semantic automata'. We conclude with some general thoughts on yet further entanglements of logic and counting in formal systems, on rethinking the qualitative/quantitative divide, and on connecting our analysis to empirical findings in cognitive science.

A weak theory of building blocks

Mutual Interpretability of Weak Essentially Undecidable Theories

Mutual Interpretability of Robinson Arithmetic and Adjunctive Set Theory with Extensionality

Notes on Interpretability between Weak First-order Theories: Theories of Sequences

Some simple theories from a Boolean algebra point of view

From Numbers to Ur-Strings

The Logic of Sequences

A first-order theory of Ulm type

INTERLEAVING LOGIC AND COUNTING

Simple Homogeneous Structures and Indiscernible Sequence Invariants

A simple continuous theory

Weak set theories in foundational debates

A Proof-theoretic Semantics for Intuitionistic Linear Logic

Universal Proof Theory: Semi-analytic Rules and Craig Interpolation

Constructive theory of ordinals

A Universal Machine for Biform Theory Graphs

Fundamental sequences based on localization

Syntax and Semantics of Abstract Binding Trees

Coding is hard

Decidable (Ac)counting with Parikh and Muller: Adding Presburger Arithmetic to Monadic Second-Order Logic over Tree-Interpretable Structures

Cubical Type Theory: a constructive interpretation of the univalence axiom