Abstract:Many democratic countries use district-based elections where there is a "seat" for each district in the governing body. In each district, the party whose candidate gets the maximum number of votes wins the corresponding seat. The result of the election is decided based on the number of seats won by the different parties. The electors (voters) can cast their votes only in the district of their residence. Thus, locations of the electors and boundaries of the districts may severely affect the election result even if the proportion of popular support (number of electors) of different parties remains unchanged. This has led to significant amount of research on whether the districts may be redrawn or electors may be moved to maximize seats for a particular party. In this paper, we frame the spatial distribution of electors in a probabilistic setting, and explore different models to capture the intra-district polarization of electors in favour of a party, or the spatial concentration of supporters of different parties. Our models are inspired by elections in India, where supporters of different parties tend to be concentrated in certain districts. We show with extensive simulations that our model can capture different statistical properties of real elections held in India. We frame parameter estimation problems to fit our models to the observed election results. Since analytical calculation of the likelihood functions are infeasible for our complex models, we use Likelihood-free Inference methods under the Approximate Bayesian Computation framework. Since this approach is highly time-consuming, we explore how supervised regression using Logistic Regression or Deep Neural Networks can be used to speed it up. We also explore how the election results can change by varying the spatial distributions of the voters, even when the proportions of popular support of the parties remain constant.

District versus at-large voting: Why district voting results in worse policy for minorities

Redistricting: Drawing the Line

Redistricting for Proportionality

How Segregation Patterns Affect the Availability of Fair District Plans

Asymmetry in Political Geography and Compactness in Districting: a Computational Analysis of Bias

Redistricting Reforms Reduce Gerrymandering by Constraining Partisan Actors

The impact of demographic structure on citizen perceptions of school district efficiency

Fairmandering: A column generation heuristic for fairness-optimized political districting

Compact majority-minority districts almost never exist

Widespread Partisan Gerrymandering Mostly Cancels Nationally, but Reduces Electoral Competition

Votemandering: Strategies and Fairness in Political Redistricting

Understanding and Mitigating the Impacts of Differentially Private Census Data on State Level Redistricting

Distortion Under Public-Spirited Voting

Electoral David vs Goliath: How does the Spatial Concentration of Electors affect District-based Elections?

Alternatives to plurality rule for single-winner elections: When do they make a difference?

You Can Have Your Cake and Redistrict It Too

Drawing Competitive Districts in Redistricting

Gerrymandering and computational redistricting

Gerrymandering and the net number of US House seats won due to vote-distribution asymmetries

The Fairness of Redistricting Ghost

Explaining Differences in Voting Patterns Across Voting Domains Using Hierarchical Bayesian Models