Abstract:Whereas we acknowledge in general certain values as crucial for the ethical debate in AI, like e.g., fairness, transparency, and accountability, these values often can stand in conflict with each other. E.g., more transparency can lead to less privacy. Introducing higher principles to balance the values faces two problematic issues: (1.) Principles also can stand in conflict with each other and defer the discussion into a purely theoretical realm. (2.) If a higher-level principle is introduced and this also stands in conflict with another principle, then a higher-higher-level principle is needed, and we will get into an infinite regress. Although ethics of AI is part of the so-called field of applied ethics and it seems therefore that it is about the application of principles and values and finding the right balance regarding certain ethical theories, e.g., Kantian ethics or utilitarianism ([1][2][3]), the traditional approaches in the field of applied ethics do not offer sufficient conceptual means to deal with practical problems. Thus, the problems that arise from the implementation of intelligent systems can also not be handled adequately, because the same issue as above arises: How can the values be balanced regarding the ethical theories? If higher-level principles are not a viable approach to resolve conflicts of values, the criteria under which they can be implemented should be taken into consideration. Therefore, it is proposed that specific criteria for the implementation of the values need to be made explicit, which will result at least in a clarification for the public debate about certain technological advancements in the field of AI. [4] Furthermore, it is proposed that to resolve these conflicts the implementation must be evaluated, whether it enables human intervention in the future instead of making further actions and interventions impossible.

Principled Frameworks for Evaluating Ethics in NLP Systems

Values, Ethics, Morals? On the Use of Moral Concepts in NLP Research

A Conceptual Framework for Ethical Evaluation of Machine Learning Systems

An Approach for Combining Ethical Principles with Public Opinion to Guide Public Policy

From ethical AI frameworks to tools: a review of approaches

A Word on Machine Ethics: A Response to Jiang et al. (2021)

Use of Formal Ethical Reviews in NLP Literature: Historical Trends and Current Practices

From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices

Ethical framework for Artificial Intelligence and Digital technologies

Ethics of AI as practical ethics

Beyond Bias and Compliance: Towards Individual Agency and Plurality of Ethics in AI

A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society

Beyond principlism: Practical strategies for ethical AI use in research practices

Tensions Between the Proxies of Human Values in AI

From the Ground Truth Up: Doing AI Ethics from Practice to Principles

A computational framework of human values for ethical AI

Beyond Fair Pay: Ethical Implications of NLP Crowdsourcing

Implementing Responsible AI: Tensions and Trade-Offs Between Ethics Aspects

Contextualizing Artificially Intelligent Morality: A Meta-Ethnography of Top-Down, Bottom-Up, and Hybrid Models for Theoretical and Applied Ethics in Artificial Intelligence

NLP for Maternal Healthcare: Perspectives and Guiding Principles in the Age of LLMs

From Algorithmic Black Boxes to Adaptive White Boxes: Declarative Decision-Theoretic Ethical Programs as Codes of Ethics