Abstract:Wendy B. London 1 , Hannah Bousquet 1 , Meredith S. Irwin 2 , Michael D. Hogarty 3 , Susan L. Cohn 4 1 Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; 2 Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; 3 Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 4 Department of Pediatrics and Comer Children's Hospital, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA Response to: Pérez-García MJ, Segura MF. Maintaining excellent outcomes: the impact of age cutoff reclassification on reduced therapy for neuroblastoma patients. Transl Pediatr 2023;12:1926-30. Erratum in: Transl Pediatr 2024;13:1514. Submitted Aug 19, 2024. Accepted for publication Oct 09, 2024. Published online Oct 28, 2024. doi: 10.21037/tp-24-319 We thank the authors for their supportive comments on our manuscript about the revision to the Children's Oncology Group (COG) neuroblastoma risk stratification based on a change in age cut-off from 12 to 18 months (1,2). The authors have provided a well-described and helpful overview of the application of biomarkers to risk stratify patients, as well as describing treatment and late effects. They have nicely summarized the comparative evidence of our successful reduction of therapy due to the described COG risk stratification changes. In addition to the change in age cut-off, COG risk stratification is anticipated to improve by using the INRGSS (International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Staging System) (3) instead of INSS (International Neuroblastoma Staging System) (4,5). INSS was utilized in 2006 when the change in age cut-off was made, but has since been replaced by the INRGSS in the COG neuroblastoma risk classifier version 2. INRGSS is a pre-surgical staging system which quantifies the disease extent at diagnosis, compared to INSS, which is post-surgical and dependent on surgical discretion. The authors describe the use of the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification (INPC) as a biomarker in COG risk stratification. Age is one of the factors used to classify tumors as INPC favorable or unfavorable. In the context of risk stratification, using both age and INPC leads to a duplication of the prognostic contribution of age, i.e., confounding. Further improvements in risk stratification should utilize the underlying components of INPC [histologic category, mitosis-karyorrhexis index (MKI), and grade of differentiation] as separate risk factors, to eliminate this problematic confounding (6). We thank the authors for describing the LEAHRN (Late Effects After High-Risk Neuroblastoma) study, the first comprehensive study specifically focused on late effects in survivors of high-risk neuroblastoma (7). These survivors were diagnosed on/after January 1, 2000, with a minimum of 5 years follow-up after diagnosis. The authors state that survivors were treated between 2000–2006; however, many LEAHRN patients were treated after 2006 with more contemporary therapy. The authors state that " While this re-classification saved children to be exposed to unnecessary treatments, their outcome should remain unaltered ". Certainly, it was our hope that their outcome remains 'unaltered', but we should clarify our intent. We hypothesized that despite receiving less intensive therapy, these groups would maintain the same outstanding survival outcomes as they had when they received high-risk therapy, albeit with fewer late effects. Fortunately, we were able to present evidence supporting that hypothesis. We agree with the authors that it is a limitation of our study that only 20 of the 105 patients received treatment through enrollment on clinical trials, and actual treatment received is unknown for most. However, there is anecdotal evidence that most patients in North America who are not enrolled on a COG clinical trial are treated "as per" the clinical trial, receiving the standard-of-care intermediate-risk or high-risk treatment according to the COG risk stratification (8). We agree with the authors that international data harmonization and novel molecular biomarkers will be critically important to further optimize risk stratification and outcomes (9). We only identified 105 patients enrolled over 30 years in our cohort of interest, highlighting the importance of international collaborations and shared data to better characterize and classify rare subgroups. Furthermore, until such time as predictive biomarkers and drugs for targeted therapy are available for neuroblastoma, research on improved prognostic stratification should continue, as one means to con -Abstract Truncated-

Estimation of the optimal radiotherapy utilization rate for childhood neuroblastoma

The radiotherapy utilization rate in pediatric tumors: An analysis of 13,305 patients

The Practice of Paediatric Radiation Oncology in Low- and Middle-income Countries: Outcomes of an International Atomic Energy Agency Study

The Application and Value of Radiotherapy at the Primary Site in Patients with High-Risk Neuroblastoma.

Global radiotherapy demands and corresponding radiotherapy-professional workforce requirements in 2022 and predicted to 2050: a population-based study

Little patients, big impacts: a narrative review of palliative and emergent radiotherapy for pediatric cancers

Development of an age- and comorbidity adjusted- optimal radiotherapy utilisation rate for women with breast cancer

Current and projected gaps in the availability of radiotherapy in the Asia-Pacific region: a country income-group analysis

Treatment and survival of childhood neuroblastoma: Evidence from a population-based study in the United States

Use of radiotherapy in patients with oesophageal, stomach, colon, rectal, liver, pancreatic, lung, and ovarian cancer: an International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) population-based study

Assessing a Suitable Radiotherapy Utilisation Benchmark for Older Patients with Head and Neck Cancer

Reduced-Dose Radiation Therapy for High-Risk Neuroblastoma: Results from a Prospective Clinical Trial

The importance of local control management in high-risk neuroblastoma in South Africa

The role of radiotherapy in multimodal treatment of non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas in children: A real life report from a tertiary center

Risk-Stratified Radiotherapy in Pediatric Cancer

Reassessing dose constraints of organs at risk in children with abdominal neuroblastoma treated with definitive radiation therapy: A correlation with late toxicity

Real World Experience of Treating Neuroblastoma: Experience from a Tertiary Cancer Centre in India

The impact of radiotherapy in metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: Results from the XXXX study: Running title: Radiotherapy in metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma

Improvements in Children's Oncology Group neuroblastoma risk stratification through a change in age cut-off and use of INRGSS

Evaluation of Image-Defined Risk Factor (IDRF) Assessment in Patients With Intermediate-risk Neuroblastoma: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group Study ANBL0531

Mathematical modeling of radiotherapy: impact of model selection on estimating minimum radiation dose for tumor control