Impact of segmented optical axial length on the performance of intraocular lens power calculation formulas
So Goto,Naoyuki Maeda,Kazuhiko Ohnuma,Tjundewo Lawu,Keiko Ogawa,Saori Sugiyama,Maki Matsumaru,Toru Noda
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001397
2024-01-16
Abstract:Purpose: To investigate the difference between the segmented axial length (AL) and the composite AL on a swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometer, and to evaluate the subsequent effects on artificial intelligence intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations: the Kane and Hill-RBF 3.0 formulas compared with established vergence formulas. Setting: National Hospital Organization, Tokyo Medical Center, Japan. Design: Retrospective case series. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing cataract surgery with a single-piece IOL were reviewed. The prediction accuracy of the Barrett Universal II, Haigis, Hill-RBF 3.0, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Kane, and SRK/T formulas based on two ALs were compared for each formula. The heteroscedastic test was used with the standard deviation (SD) of prediction errors as the endpoint for formula performance. Results: The study included 145 eyes of 145 patients. The segmented AL (24.83 ± 1.89) was significantly shorter than the composite AL (24.88 ± 1.96, P < 0.001). Bland–Altman analysis revealed a negative proportional bias for the differences between the segmented AL and the composite AL. The SD values obtained by Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas based on the segmented AL (0.52, 0.54, and 0.50 diopters [D], respectively) were significantly lower than those based on the composite AL (0.57, 0.60, and 0.52 D, respectively, P < .01). Conclusion: The segmented ALs were longer in short eyes and shorter in long eyes than the composite ALs. The refractive accuracy can be improved in the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas by changing the composite ALs to the segmented ALs.
ophthalmology,surgery