Abstract:Introduction: Recently, transradial access (TRA) for mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke has been proposed as an alternative due to potential advantages such as reduced access site complications. However, its safety and efficacy compared to the traditional transfemoral access (TFA) remain debated. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase from inception to May 15, 2024. We included all randomized controlled trials and observational studies. The primary outcome was successful recanalization, defined as achieving Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) grades 2b-3. Secondary outcomes included complete recanalization (TICI grade 3), achieving TICI 2c or higher, functional outcomes (modified Rankin Score (mRS) at discharge and 90 days, mRS 0-2 at 90 days, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at discharge, Length of hospital stay (LOS)), procedural efficiency (access-to-perfusion time, first-pass reperfusion, mean number of passes, crossover to alternate approach), and safety/survival outcomes (access site complications, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, in-hospital and 90-day mortality). This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023462293). Results: The meta-analysis included 13 studies with a combined total of 4759 patients. No statistically significant difference was found between TRA and TFA for successful recanalization (RR = 1.00 [95 % CI, 0.97-1.04], P = 0.88). Analysis also showed no significant difference in favorable functional outcomes between groups (RR = 0.88, [95 % CI, 0.71-1.09], P = 0.25) with significant heterogeneity (P = 0.008, I² = 71 %), which was resolved by excluding the study of Phillips et al., 2020 (P = 0.58, I² = 0 %), then favoring TFA over TRA (RR = 0.80, [95 % CI, 0.70-0.92], P = 0.002). TFA also had a statistically significant lower risk of crossover to TRA (RR = 1.68, [95 % CI, 0.99-2.86], P = 0.05). Overall, TRA was associated with a significantly shorter length of stay (MD = -1.49, 95 % CI [-2.93 to -0.05], P = 0.04, I² = 75 %), though sensitivity analysis showed a non-significant mean difference still favoring TRA (MD = -0.59; 95 % CI: [-1.28 to -0.10], P = 0.09, I² = 0 %). There was no difference between TRA and TFA regarding complete recanalization, achieving TICI 2c or higher, procedural efficiency, functional outcomes, safety, and survival. Conclusion: Our updated meta-analysis demonstrates that TRA is comparable to TFA, except for a higher proportion of patients achieving mRS 0-2 at 90 days with TFA, lower crossover rates with TFA, and possibly a shorter length of stay (LOS) with TRA. Further research, particularly randomized studies, is needed to confirm these findings due to the observational nature of included studies.

Transradial versus transfemoral access for diagnostic cerebral angiography: frequency of acute MRI findings in 500 consecutive patients at a single center

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transradial Access for Carotid Artery Stenting

Transradial versus transfemoral access for mechanical thrombectomy: A single institution experience

Decreased Incidence of Radial Artery Vasospasm Using a Distal Transradial Approach in Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography: A Comparison of 200 Consecutive Cases

706 Radial Versus Femoral Access for Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

Abstract 1122‐000067: Radial Versus Femoral Artery Access for Mechanical Thrombectomy Following IV tPA Administration

Risk of brain injury during diagnostic coronary angiography: comparison between right and left radial approach

Transradial versus transfemoral access for anterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy: analysis of 375 consecutive cases

Anemia and Risk of Periprocedural Cerebral Injury Detected by Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Transradial approach using a distal access catheter without guiding support for symptomatic intracranial vertebral artery and basilar artery stenosis: a multicenter experience and technical procedure

320 Intraoperative Angiography in Neurosurgery: Temporal Trend, Access Site, and Operative Indication Considerations From a Six-year Institutional Experience

Clinical Significance of Diffusion-Weighted Brain MRI Lesions After TAVR: Results of a Patient-Level Pooled Analysis

Comparative study of the clinical value of digital subtraction angiography via femoral and radial arterial paths

Can diffusion- and perfusion-weighted imaging alone accurately triage anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke patients to endovascular therapy?

Preoperative cerebral angiography nearly doubles the rate of diffusion-weighted imaging lesion detection following minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage

Transradial versus transfemoral artery access in mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract WP128: Susceptibility Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Regional Cerebrovascular Reservoir Capacity in Angiographically Proven Large Artery Disease in Acute Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack

Making Neuroendovascular Therapy for Cerebrovascular Disease Using Distal/Trans-radial Artery Access Safer

Safety and Efficacy of Radial Versus Femoral Artery Access for Mechanical Thrombectomy Procedures Following Intravenous Administration of Tissue Plasminogen Activator

Rate and Prognosis of Brain Ischemia in Patients With Lower-Risk Transient or Persistent Minor Neurologic Events

Transradial approach for middle meningeal artery embolization is a safe alternative to transfemoral approach in patients with chronic subdural hematoma: A single-center retrospective comparative study