Abstract:Background: While Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting (TFCAS) is a valid minimally invasive option for patients who also might be suitable for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR), alternative access sites such as transbrachial (TB) or transradial (TR) are only utilized when anatomic factors preclude direct carotid or transfemoral access. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the outcomes of TR/TB access in comparison to TF for percutaneous carotid artery revascularization. Methods: All patients undergoing non-TCAR carotid artery stenting (CAS) from January 2012 to June 2021 in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) Database were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the access site for CAS: TF or TR/TB. Primary outcomes included stroke/death, technical failure and access site complications (hematoma, stenosis, infection, pseudoaneurysm and AV fistula). Secondary outcomes included stroke, TIA, MI, death, non-home discharge, extended length of postoperative stay (LOS) (>1 day), and composite endpoints of stroke/MI and stroke/death/MI. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess postoperative outcomes, and results were adjusted for relevant potential confounders including age, gender, race, degree of stenosis, symptomatic status, anesthesia, comorbidities, and preoperative medications. Results: Out of the 23,965 patients, TR/TB approach was employed in 819 (3.4%) while TF was used in 23,146 (96.6%). Baseline characteristics found men were more likely to undergo revascularization using TR/TB approach (69.4% vs. 64.9%, P = 0.009). Patients undergoing TR/TB approach were also more likely to be symptomatic (49.9% vs. 28.6%, P < 0.001). Guideline directed medications were more frequently used with TR/TB including P2Y12 inhibitor (80.3% vs. 74.7%, P < 0.01), statin (83.8% vs. 80.6%), and aspirin (88.3% vs. 84.5%, P = 0.003) preoperatively. On univariate analysis, patients with TB/TR approach experienced higher rates of adverse outcomes. After adjusting for potential confounders, TR/TB patients had no significant increase in the risk of stroke/death [aOR 1.10 (0.69-1.76), P = 0.675]; however, the use of TR/TB access was associated with a more than 2-fold increase in risk for in-hospital MI [aOR 2.39 (1.32-4.30), P = 0.004] and 2-fold increase in risk of technical failure [aOR 2.21 (1.31-3.73) P = 0.003]. The use of TR/TB access was also associated with a 50% reduction in the risk of access site complications [aOR 0.53 (0.32-0.85), P = 0.009]. Conclusions: This study confirms that although technically more challenging, TR or TB approach serves as a reasonable alternative with lower access site complications for CAS particularly in patients where anatomic factors preclude revascularization by TFCAS or TCAR. However, TR/TB is associated with an increased risk of technical failure and myocardial infarction, which requires further study.

Abstract 1122‐000067: Radial Versus Femoral Artery Access for Mechanical Thrombectomy Following IV tPA Administration

Safety and Efficacy of Radial Versus Femoral Artery Access for Mechanical Thrombectomy Procedures Following Intravenous Administration of Tissue Plasminogen Activator

Transradial versus transfemoral access for mechanical thrombectomy: A single institution experience

Transradial versus transfemoral access for anterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy: analysis of 375 consecutive cases

Transradial versus transfemoral artery access in mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transradial Access for Carotid Artery Stenting

Mechanical thrombectomy with a balloon-guide catheter: sheathless transradial versus transfemoral approach

Abstract 81: Radial versus Femoral Access for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Radial Versus Femoral Access for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Stroke Patients: A Non-Inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial

Trans-Carotid and Trans-Radial Access for Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Radial Versus Femoral Access for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Stroke: A Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trial

Transradial approach for middle meningeal artery embolization is a safe alternative to transfemoral approach in patients with chronic subdural hematoma: A single-center retrospective comparative study

Comparison between transradial and transfemoral mechanical thrombectomy for ICA and M1 occlusions: insights from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR)

Making Neuroendovascular Therapy for Cerebrovascular Disease Using Distal/Trans-radial Artery Access Safer

Radial versus femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Trial sequential analysis

Abstract TP213: Predictors of Functional Independence Among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated With Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis as Adjunct to Mechanical Thrombectomy

Abstract TMP86: Effects of Tenecteplase versus Alteplase in Stroke Patients With Large Vessel Occlusions Who Achieve Full Recanalization

Abstract WP24: Safety of Tenecteplase vs Alteplase in Telestroke: A Large Multistate Experience (STAT)

Safety and efficacy of radial access in trauma in 65 trauma endovascular cases

Comparing Outcomes of Transfemoral Versus Transbrachial or Transradial Approach in Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS)

Abstract 93: Effect Of Intravenous Tirofiban Following Successful Endovascular Thrombectomy On Functional Outcomes In Large Artery Atherosclerotic Stroke: Secondary Analysis Of A Randomized Clinical Trial