Abstract:Accurate identification of gas-liquid two-phase flow patterns during oil and gas drilling is critical to analyzing bottom hole pressure, detecting overflows in time, and preventing blowout accidents. Since the gas-liquid two-phase flow has deformable interfaces, resulting in complex gas-liquid two-phase flow patterns, the existing gas-liquid two-phase flow patterns are limited in width in terms of pipe diameter and incline, leading to adaptation problems in experimental flow patterns and mechanistic models. Machine learning methods provide potential tools for solving gas-liquid two-phase flow pattern identification. In this paper, a sample database with 5879 data points was established by reviewing and organizing existing literature focusing on normal pressure and temperature, and air-water experimental conditions to provide a data-preparation for the relationship between gas and liquid velocities, pipe diameter and incline characteristics and flow pattern objectives. Four machine learning models, including K-Nearest Neighbor, Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree and Random Forest, were investigated, and each model was trained and tested using a sample database to reveal the performance of four types of supervised machine learning methods, representing similarity, probability, inductive inference and ensemble-learning principles, for gas-liquid two-phase flow pattern recognition, and the prediction accuracy was 0.86, Naïve Bayes is 0.56, Decision Tree is 0.89 and Random Forest 0.97. Comprehensive analysis of each model confusion matrix shows that the machine learning method has the best recognition of dispersed bubble flow, better recognition of slug flow, and the worst recognition of churn flow among the nine flow patterns which proves the controversial nature of the mechanism model in the transition from slug flow to churn flow. This paper uses experimental data as model input features, making the machine learning-based gas-liquid two-phase flow pattern identification model meaningful for practical engineering applications, and also demonstrating the feasibility of using supervised machine learning methods for gas-liquid two-phase flow pattern identification at normal pressure and temperature, wide-range of pipe diameter and incline.

Actively Exploring Informative Data for Smart Modeling of Industrial Multiphase Flow Processes

Active Learning for Modeling and Prediction of Dynamical Fluid Processes

Transfer Learning Based on Incorporating Source Knowledge Using Gaussian Process Models for Quick Modeling of Dynamic Target Processes

Multiphase Flow Modeling Using Process Knowledge Integrating Temporal Graph Convolution Network

Data-Driven Dynamic Modeling and Online Monitoring for Multiphase and Multimode Batch Processes with Uneven Batch Durations

Data-driven predictive control for the industrial processes with multiphase and transition

Development of a smart multiphase system for disperse flows using machine learning

Probabilistic Modeling and Prediction of Dynamic Discharge Process in Multiphase Pumps

Recent Progress of Machine Learning in Flow Modeling and Active Flow Control

Supervised Machine Learning Mode for Predicting Gas-Liquid Flow Patterns in Upward Inclined Pipe

Dynamic Probabilistic Latent Variable Model for Process Data Modeling and Regression Application

Towards Predictive Maintenance of a Heavy-Duty Gas Turbine A New Hybrid Intelligent Methodology for Performance Simulation

Improving the Generalization Performance of Data-driven Predictive Model for Dynamic Process Systems

Hybrid Machine Learning Modeling of Engineering Systems -- A Probabilistic Perspective Tested on a Multiphase Flow Modeling Case Study

Data-driven Adaptive Modeling Method for Industrial Processes and Its Application in Flotation Reagent Control.

Towards Continual Knowledge Transfer in Modeling Manufacturing Processes under Non-Stationary Data Streams

Combining machine learning and process engineering physics towards enhanced accuracy and explainability of data-driven models

Online Recognition of the Multiphase Flow Regime

Oil-Gas Multiphase Flow Surrogate Model Embedded With Mechanism Formulas

Data-driven modeling for unsteady aerodynamics and aeroelasticity

Active Learning over DNN: Automated Engineering Design Optimization for Fluid Dynamics Based on Self-Simulated Dataset