Abstract:We develop neural-network active flow controllers using a deep learning partial differential equation augmentation method (DPM). The end-to-end sensitivities for optimization are computed using adjoints of the governing equations without restriction on the terms that may appear in the objective function. In one-dimensional Burgers' examples with analytic (manufactured) control functions, DPM-based control is comparably effective to standard supervised learning for in-sample solutions and more effective for out-of-sample solutions, i.e., with different analytic control functions. The influence of the optimization time interval and neutral-network width is analyzed, the results of which influence algorithm design and hyperparameter choice, balancing control efficacy with computational cost. We subsequently develop adjoint-based controllers for two flow scenarios. First, we compare the drag-reduction performance and optimization cost of adjoint-based controllers and deep reinforcement learning (DRL) -based controllers for two-dimensional, incompressible, confined flow over a cylinder at Re=100 , with control achieved by synthetic body forces along the cylinder boundary. The required model complexity for the DRL-based controller is 4229 times that required for the DPM-based controller. In these tests, the DPM-based controller is 4.85 times more effective and 63.2 times less computationally intensive to train than the DRL-based controller. Second, we test DPM-based control for compressible, unconfined flow over a cylinder and extrapolate the controller to out-of-sample Reynolds numbers. We also train a simplified, steady, offline controller based on the DPM control law. Both online (DPM) and offline (steady) controllers stabilize the vortex shedding with a 99% drag reduction, demonstrating the robustness of the learning approach. For out-of-sample flows ( Re={50,200,300,400} ), both the online and offline controllers successfully reduce drag and stabilize vortex shedding, indicating that the DPM-based approach results in a stable model. A key attractive feature is the flexibility of adjoint-based optimization, which permits optimization over arbitrarily defined control laws without the need to match a priori known functions. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.013901 ©2024 American Physical Society

Active Learning over DNN: Automated Engineering Design Optimization for Fluid Dynamics Based on Self-Simulated Dataset

Optimization of a Gas–Liquid Dual-Impeller Stirred Tank Based on Deep Learning with a Small Data Set from CFD Simulation

Deep reinforcement learning in fluid mechanics: A promising method for both active flow control and shape optimization

Machine learning based approach to fluid dynamics

Active Learning for Modeling and Prediction of Dynamical Fluid Processes

A comprehensive deep learning geometric shape optimization framework with field prediction surrogate and reinforcement learning

An Exploration of Flow Control Using Machine Learning and Computational Fluid Dynamics

DADO -- Low-Cost Query Strategies for Deep Active Design Optimization

Aerodynamic shape optimization using a novel optimizer based on machine learning techniques

Physics-guided Design and Learning of Neural Networks for Predicting Drag Force on Particle Suspensions in Moving Fluids

Enhanced data efficiency using deep neural networks and Gaussian processes for aerodynamic design optimization

FluidsNet: End-to-end Learning for Lagrangian Fluid Simulation

Learning Incompressible Fluid Dynamics from Scratch -- Towards Fast, Differentiable Fluid Models that Generalize

Physical Design using Differentiable Learned Simulators

Investigation of the aerodynamic optimization design of fluid machinery based on machine learning

Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamics

Evolutionary Multi-Objective Aerodynamic Design Optimization Using CFD Simulation Incorporating Deep Neural Network

Adjoint-based machine learning for active flow control

Surrogate Modeling for Fluid Flows Based on Physics-Constrained Deep Learning Without Simulation Data

Inverse design optimization framework via a two-step deep learning approach: application to a wind turbine airfoil

NeuralFluid: Neural Fluidic System Design and Control with Differentiable Simulation