A Retrospective Analysis of Laparoscopic and Open Ureterolysis for Treating the Patients with Retroperitoneal Fibrosis
Fan Zhang,Xu Zhang,Bao Hong,Jiangping Gao,Jun Dong,Yuguang Yang,Wei Cai,Axiang Xu,Xin Ma,Hongzhao Li
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of laparoscopic ureterolysis in the treatment of retroperitoneal fibrosis,and compare the effectiveness with the therapy of open ureterolysis.Methods The clinical data of 10 patients undergone laparoscopic ureterolysis(LS group) and 13 patients undergone open ureterolysis(OS group) were retrospectively reviewed.A comparison was performed between the two groups in terms of operative preparing time,operating time,estimated blood loss,recovery of intestinal function,ambulation activities after operation,postoperative length of hospital stay,total length of hospital stay and complication.Results The estimated blood loss,recovery of intestinal function,postoperative length of hospital stay,total length of hospital stay in LS group(59.50ml,2.70±0.82d,8.70±1.42d,17.40±5.64d) were all better than those in OS group(100.00ml,3.85±1.07d,11.62±3.18d,23.38±5.45d,P 0.05).No transfusion was required and no complication occurred in the both groups.With a follow-up of 18 months,no recurrence in situ and no obstruction were observed in the both groups.Conclusions Laparoscopic ureterolysis has the advantages of less blood loss,rapid recovery of intestinal function,shorter hospital stay as compared to that of open ureterolysis.It is therefore a safe and effective surgical procedure in treatment of retroperitoneal fibrosis.