National Pediatrician-Scientist Collaborative Workgroup comment on new ACGME requirements' impact on pediatric physician-scientists
Daniel J Moore,Weston Powell,Debra Boyer,Katherine Bline,Lyndsay Harshman,Andrew Nowalk,Audrea Burns,Jordan S Orange,NPSCW,Kara L Calkins,Emma Mohr,Bryce Binstadt,David Olson,Danielle Callaway,Kelly Harris,Jacquelyn D Lajiness,Mel Heyman,Audra Nicole Iness,Rebecca Blankenburg,Carrie Rassbach,Mark Allen Ward,Satid Thammasitboon,Tara Wenger,Catherine Forster,Suong Nguyen,Michael D Hogarty,Pnina Weiss,Ian Davis,Candace Gildner,Bobbi J Byrne,Anthony French,Fernando Gonzalez,Andrew J Nowalk,Briana Christophers,Jacqueline Ho,Rasheed Gbadegesin,Catherine S Forster,Kate G Ackerman,Stephanie D Davis,Valerie A Almenas,Lyndsay A Harshman,Misty Good,James Bayrer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-023-02795-9
Abstract:Background: The ACGME recently released its recommendation for updates to the program requirements for pediatrics. These updates proposed changes to allocation of resident clinical time and a greater emphasis on individualization. The potential impact of these changes on the training of physician-scientists is discussed. Methods: Discussion of the proposed changes was held within the members of the National Pediatrician-Scientist Collaborative Workgroup, a group that represents scientists, trainees, program directors, chairs, and physician-scientist educators at nearly 30 residency programs from across the US with a focus on understanding and developing optimal approaches to physician-scientist training. Consideration was given to the both the personal and institutional impact of the proposal for physician-scientist development. Results: Both threats and opportunities were identified. Key opportunities include the enhanced individualized training time that could be used to explore research. Threats include re-allocation of clinical training time that may strain institutions financially, expand clinical service requirements for other early career stage individuals, and alter exposure to a broad range of pediatric specialists and sub-specialists that impact career development. Conclusion: The NPSCW encourages consideration of the impact of changing program requirements on physician-scientist development to include ongoing discussion amongst mentors, programs, and trainees to understand and mitigate impact of new program requirements on the development of pediatrician-scientists.