A note on intrinsic viscosity–molecular weight relationships

Tōru Kawai,Ryūnosuke Naito
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1960.070030814
IF: 3
1960-03-01
Journal of Applied Polymer Science
Abstract:From an examination of experimental data on a number of series of well‐fractionated polymer homologs in various solvents, interesting correlations were found between the constants Km and a in the Mark‐Houwink equation often used in describing the relationship between intrinsic viscosity and molecular weight. For a given series of polymer homologs in different solvents, Km regularly decreases with increasing a; moreover, in the Km−a curves, plots for various polymeric substances all conform to one of two typical curves, the one being for flexible, noncrystallizable polymers and the other for semiflexible, crystalline polymers. In this paper an attempt has been made to put these experimental relationships on a theoretical basis. Combination of the theoretical expressions obtained by Flory and Fox with the Mark‐Houwink equation yields the equation $$ ({{K_m } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{K_m } K}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} K})^{2/3} = [(4/3)(1/\beta - 10/3)^{ - 1} + 1]/M_0^{2\beta /3} $$ where β = a − 1/2, K is a constant characteristic of the polymer chain, and M0 is the arithmetical average of the upper and lower limits of the molecular weight range covered. The experimental relations between Km and a mentioned above can be quite adequately accounted for by this equation. Although eq. (1) was originally derived for molecularly homogeneous polymers, it has been shown to be valid also for molecularly heterogeneous polymers if K is replaced by K*, which reflects the molecular heterogeneity of a series of fractionated (or unfractionated) polymer homologs. Although this value gives only an average heterogeneity over a series of the polymer homologs used and depends upon the method of molecular weight determination, its use furnishes a convenient method either for the examination of newly obtained [η] vs. M data or for the choice of the most reliable relationship among those obtained by various authors for a given polymer‐solvent combination. When the theory of Flory and Fox is applicable and K is known for a given polymer, the Houwink constants can be easily computed through use of eq. (1) from the measurements of [η] and M for only one (carefully fractionated) sample, without recourse to more laborious methods usually used. This is, so to speak, a “one‐point method” of obtaining the intrinsic viscosity–molecular weight relationship.
polymer science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?