Abstract:Importance Although robotic surgery has become an established approach for a wide range of elective operations, data on its utility and outcomes are limited in the setting of emergency general surgery. Objectives To describe temporal trends in the use of laparoscopic and robotic approaches and compare outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for 4 common emergent surgical procedures. Design, Setting, and Participants A retrospective cohort study of an all-payer discharge database of 829 US facilities was conducted from calendar years 2013 to 2021. Data analysis was performed from July 2022 to November 2023. A total of 1 067 263 emergent or urgent cholecystectomies (n = 793 800), colectomies (n = 89 098), inguinal hernia repairs (n = 65 039), and ventral hernia repairs (n = 119 326) in patients aged 18 years or older were included. Exposure Surgical approach (robotic, laparoscopic, or open) to emergent or urgent cholecystectomy, colectomy, inguinal hernia repair, or ventral hernia repair. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the temporal trend in use of each operative approach (laparoscopic, robotic, or open). Secondary outcomes included conversion to open surgery and length of stay (both total and postoperative). Temporal trends were measured using linear regression. Propensity score matching was used to compare secondary outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery groups. Results During the study period, the use of robotic surgery increased significantly year-over-year for all procedures: 0.7% for cholecystectomy, 0.9% for colectomy, 1.9% for inguinal hernia repair, and 1.1% for ventral hernia repair. There was a corresponding decrease in the open surgical approach for all cases. Compared with laparoscopy, robotic surgery was associated with a significantly lower risk of conversion to open surgery: cholecystectomy, 1.7% vs 3.0% (odds ratio [OR], 0.55 [95% CI, 0.49-0.62]); colectomy, 11.2% vs 25.5% (OR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.32-0.42]); inguinal hernia repair, 2.4% vs 10.7% (OR, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.16-0.26]); and ventral hernia repair, 3.5% vs 10.9% (OR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.25-0.36]). Robotic surgery was associated with shorter postoperative lengths of stay for colectomy (−0.48 [95% CI, −0.60 to −0.35] days), inguinal hernia repair (−0.20 [95% CI, −0.30 to −0.10] days), and ventral hernia repair (−0.16 [95% CI, −0.26 to −0.06] days). Conclusions and Relevance While robotic surgery is still not broadly used for emergency general surgery, the findings of this study suggest it is becoming more prevalent and may be associated with better outcomes as measured by reduced conversion to open surgery and decreased length of stay.

The role of RObotic surgery in EMergency setting (ROEM): protocol for a multicentre, observational, prospective international study on the use of robotic platform in emergency surgery

Robotic surgery in emergency setting: 2021 WSES position paper

Emergency robotic surgery: the experience of a single center and review of the literature

Implementing Enhanced Perioperative Care in Emergency General Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study

International consensus guidelines on robotic pancreatic surgery in 2023

Training curriculum in minimally invasive emergency digestive surgery: 2022 WSES position paper

Emergent robotic surgery conversions: improving operating room team performance through high fidelity simulations

Robotic Technology in Emergency General Surgery Cases in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery

Robotic operations in urgent general surgery: a systematic review

National trends and outcomes of robotic emergency general surgery in the United States

From simulation to surgery, advancements and challenges in robotic training for radical prostatectomy: a narrative review

Initial Experience at a High-Volume Robotic Centre

Outpatient Robotic Urological Surgery: An Evidence-based Analysis

Robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery in the emergency setting: a systematic review

Hybrid Robotics for Endoscopic Transnasal Skull Base Surgery: Single-Centre Case Series

The new robotic system HUGO RAS for gynecologic surgery: First European experience from Gemelli Hospital

The emerging role of robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Advances in Robotic Surgery: A Review of New Surgical Platforms

A systematic review of robot-assisted anti-reflux surgery to examine reporting standards

Establishing a successful robotic surgery program and improving operating room efficiency: literature review and our experience report

Robot-Assisted Sacropexy with the Novel HUGO Robot-Assisted Surgery System: Initial Experience and Surgical Setup at a Tertiary Referral Robotic Center