Abstract:Importance Although robotic surgery has become an established approach for a wide range of elective operations, data on its utility and outcomes are limited in the setting of emergency general surgery. Objectives To describe temporal trends in the use of laparoscopic and robotic approaches and compare outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for 4 common emergent surgical procedures. Design, Setting, and Participants A retrospective cohort study of an all-payer discharge database of 829 US facilities was conducted from calendar years 2013 to 2021. Data analysis was performed from July 2022 to November 2023. A total of 1 067 263 emergent or urgent cholecystectomies (n = 793 800), colectomies (n = 89 098), inguinal hernia repairs (n = 65 039), and ventral hernia repairs (n = 119 326) in patients aged 18 years or older were included. Exposure Surgical approach (robotic, laparoscopic, or open) to emergent or urgent cholecystectomy, colectomy, inguinal hernia repair, or ventral hernia repair. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the temporal trend in use of each operative approach (laparoscopic, robotic, or open). Secondary outcomes included conversion to open surgery and length of stay (both total and postoperative). Temporal trends were measured using linear regression. Propensity score matching was used to compare secondary outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery groups. Results During the study period, the use of robotic surgery increased significantly year-over-year for all procedures: 0.7% for cholecystectomy, 0.9% for colectomy, 1.9% for inguinal hernia repair, and 1.1% for ventral hernia repair. There was a corresponding decrease in the open surgical approach for all cases. Compared with laparoscopy, robotic surgery was associated with a significantly lower risk of conversion to open surgery: cholecystectomy, 1.7% vs 3.0% (odds ratio [OR], 0.55 [95% CI, 0.49-0.62]); colectomy, 11.2% vs 25.5% (OR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.32-0.42]); inguinal hernia repair, 2.4% vs 10.7% (OR, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.16-0.26]); and ventral hernia repair, 3.5% vs 10.9% (OR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.25-0.36]). Robotic surgery was associated with shorter postoperative lengths of stay for colectomy (−0.48 [95% CI, −0.60 to −0.35] days), inguinal hernia repair (−0.20 [95% CI, −0.30 to −0.10] days), and ventral hernia repair (−0.16 [95% CI, −0.26 to −0.06] days). Conclusions and Relevance While robotic surgery is still not broadly used for emergency general surgery, the findings of this study suggest it is becoming more prevalent and may be associated with better outcomes as measured by reduced conversion to open surgery and decreased length of stay.

Emergency robotic surgery: the experience of a single center and review of the literature

Robotic surgery in emergency setting: 2021 WSES position paper

The role of RObotic surgery in EMergency setting (ROEM): protocol for a multicentre, observational, prospective international study on the use of robotic platform in emergency surgery

Robotic operations in urgent general surgery: a systematic review

Robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery in the emergency setting: a systematic review

Controversial Role of Robot in Primary and Revisional Bariatric Surgery Procedures: Review of the Literature and Personal Experience

Robotic Technology in Emergency General Surgery Cases in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery

Step-by-step roadmap to building a robotic acute care surgery program (RACSP) in a level I trauma center: outcomes and lessons learned after 1-year implementation

Feasibility of robotic cholecystectomy at an academic center with a young robotic surgery program: a retrospective cohort study with umbrella review

Novel Robotic Platforms for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in Urology: A Narrative Review

Robotic surgeries in pediatric patients: an early experience in a single center

National trends and outcomes of robotic emergency general surgery in the United States

Outpatient Robotic Urological Surgery: An Evidence-based Analysis

Initial Experience at a High-Volume Robotic Centre

From simulation to surgery, advancements and challenges in robotic training for radical prostatectomy: a narrative review

Robot-Assisted Sacropexy with the Novel HUGO Robot-Assisted Surgery System: Initial Experience and Surgical Setup at a Tertiary Referral Robotic Center

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery: recent advances in urology

Establishing a successful robotic surgery program and improving operating room efficiency: literature review and our experience report

Robotic-assisted surgery in pediatrics: what is evidence-based?—a literature review

Anesthesia management and patient outcomes in robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery: A single center experience

Robotic single port surgery: Current status and future considerations