Evaluating Urban Green Space Inequity to Promote Distributional Justice in Portland, Oregon

Evan Elderbrock,Kory Russel,Yekang Ko,Elizabeth Budd,Lilah Gonen,Chris Enright
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060720
IF: 3.905
2024-05-22
Land
Abstract:Access and exposure to urban green space—the combination of parks and vegetative cover in cities—are associated with various health benefits. As urban green space is often unequally distributed throughout cities, understanding how it is allocated across socio-demographic populations can help city planners and policy makers identify and address urban environmental justice and health equity issues. To our knowledge, no studies have yet combined assessments of park quality, park availability, and green cover to inform equitable urban green space planning. To this end, we developed a comprehensive methodology to identify urban green space inequities at the city scale and applied it in Portland, OR, USA. After auditing all public parks in Portland and gathering green cover data from publicly accessible repositories, we used a suite of statistical tests to evaluate distribution of parks and green cover across Census block groups, comprising race, ethnicity, income, and educational attainment characteristics. Right-of-way tree canopy cover was the most significant urban green space inequity identified in bivariate analysis (rs = −0.73). Spatial autoregressive models identified that right-of-way, private, and overall tree canopy cover (Nagelkerke pseudo-R2 = 0.66, 0.77, and 0.67, respectively) significantly decreased with the proportion of minoritized racial population and increased with median income. The results were then used to identify priority locations for specific urban green space investments. This research establishes a process to assess intra-urban green space inequities, as well as identify data-informed and spatially explicit planning priorities to promote health equity and environmental justice.
environmental studies
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper aims to assess the inequality of urban green space to promote distributive justice within cities. Specifically, the study focuses on the distribution of urban green spaces (including parks and vegetation cover) among different socio-demographic groups, including race, ethnicity, income, and education levels. Through this assessment, the research hopes to help urban planners and policymakers identify and address issues of urban environmental justice and health equity. ### Research Background Urban green spaces have multiple benefits for human health, such as regulating temperature, mitigating floods, reducing air pollution, improving mental health, and providing opportunities for physical activity. However, the distribution of urban green spaces is often uneven, leading to issues of environmental justice and health equity between different communities. Although previous studies have shown racial and income disparities in the distribution of urban green spaces, few studies have comprehensively evaluated park quality, park availability, and green coverage together. ### Research Objectives 1. **Data Collection**: Collect comprehensive data on park quality, park availability, and green coverage. 2. **Identify Inequality**: Identify inequalities in access to and exposure to urban green spaces specific to marginalized communities. 3. **Propose Recommendations**: Propose specific, data-driven urban green space planning priorities based on the data. ### Methods The study was conducted in Portland, Oregon, using the following methods: 1. **Socio-demographic Variables**: Selected socio-demographic characteristics similar to previous studies, including race, ethnicity, income, and education levels. 2. **Green Space Variables**: Collected a wide range of green space indicators, including park quality, park availability, and green coverage. 3. **Statistical Analysis**: Conducted bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses to identify environmental justice issues related to access to and exposure to urban green spaces. 4. **Priority Area Identification**: Identified areas that need focused investment in urban green spaces based on statistical results. ### Results The study found that street tree canopy coverage is one of the most significant indicators of urban green space inequality, negatively correlated with the proportion of minority populations and positively correlated with median income. Through spatial autoregressive models, the study further confirmed these relationships and proposed specific investment priority areas. ### Significance This study establishes a process for assessing urban green space inequality and provides data-driven, spatially explicit planning priorities to promote health equity and environmental justice. This has important reference value for other cities and regions as well.