Antimony centre in three different roles: Donor strength or acceptor ability determine the bonding pattern?

Richard Chlebík,Csilla Fekete,Roman Jambor,Aleš Růžička,Zoltán Benkő,Libor Dostál
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4dt02787f
IF: 4
2024-10-09
Dalton Transactions
Abstract:A set of antimony(III) compounds containing ligand (Ar) with pendant guanidine function (where Ar = 2-[(Me2N)2C=N]C6H4) were prepared and characterized. This includes triorgano- Ar3Sb, diorgano- Ar2SbCl and monoorgano- ArSbCl2 compounds and they were characterized by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy and by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis (sc-XRD). The coordination capability of Ar3Sb and Ar2SbCl was examined in the reactions with either cis-[PdCl2(CH3CN)2] or PtCl2 and complexes cis-[(2-Sb,N-Ar3Sb)MCl2] (M = Pd 1, Pt 2) and [(3-N,Sb,N-Ar2SbCl)MCl2] (M = Pd 3, Pt 4) were isolated, while their structures were determined by sc-XRD. Notably, the ligands Ar3Sb and Ar2SbCl display different coordination modes: bidentate and tridentate, respectively, and the antimony exhibits three distinct bonding modes in complexes 1-4, which was also subjected to a theoretical study.
chemistry, inorganic & nuclear
What problem does this paper attempt to address?