Structural and Spectroscopic Comparison of Soft-Se vs. Hard-O Donor Bonding in Trivalent Americium/Neodymium Molecules

Conrad A P Goodwin,Anthony W Schlimgen,Thomas E Albrecht-Schönzart,Enrique R Batista,Andrew J Gaunt,Michael T Janicke,Stosh A Kozimor,Brian L Scott,Lauren M Stevens,Frankie D White,Ping Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202017186
2021-04-19
Abstract:Covalency is often considered to be an influential factor in driving An3+ vs. Ln3+ selectivity invoked by soft donor ligands. This is intensely debated, particularly the extent to which An3+ /Ln3+ covalency differences prevail and manifest as the f-block is traversed, and the effects of periodic breaks beyond Pu. Herein, two Am complexes, [Am{N(E=PPh2 )2 }3 ] (1-Am, E=Se; 2-Am, E=O) are compared to isoradial [Nd{N(E=PPh2 )2 }3 ] (1-Nd, 2-Nd) complexes. Covalent contributions are assessed and compared to U/La and Pu/Ce analogues. Through ab initio calculations grounded in UV-vis-NIR spectroscopy and single-crystal X-ray structures, we observe differences in f orbital involvement between Am-Se and Nd-Se bonds, which are not present in O-donor congeners.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?