Abstract:The National Quality Framework (NQF) was intended to drive continuous improvement in education and care services in Australia. Ten years into implementation, the effectiveness of the NQF is demonstrated by steady improvements in quality as measured against the National Quality Standard (NQS). The process of assessing and rating services is a key element in the NQF, drawing together regulatory compliance and quality assurance. This paper draws on findings from a national Quality Improvement Research Project investigating the characteristics, processes, challenges and enablers of quality improvement in long day care services, concentrating on Quality Area 1 Educational program and practice and Quality Area 7 Governance and leadership. This was a mixed-method study focusing on long day care services that had improved their rating from Working toward NQS to Meeting NQS or to Exceeding NQS. The study comprised three phases, and in this paper, we draw on Phase 3 to understand the contribution of the NQS Assessment and Rating (A&R) process to continuous quality improvement from the standpoint of providers and professionals delivering these services. Phase 3 involved qualitative case studies of 15 long day care services to investigate factors that enabled and challenged quality improvement. Data was collected during two-day site visits, using professional conversations and field notes to elicit the views and experiences of service providers, leaders and educators. In this paper, we look at how the A&R process is experienced by those involved in service provision, with a focus on the factors that enabled and challenged quality improvement. Recognizing the interchangeability of enablers and challenges, three broad themes emerged: (i) curriculum knowledge, pedagogical skills and agency; (ii) collaborative leadership and teamwork; and (iii) meaningful engagement in the A&R process. The study found that meaningful engagement in the A&R process informed priorities for ongoing learning and acted as a catalyst for continuous quality improvement. Apprised by stakeholder views and experiences of A&R, we offer a model to foster stakeholder participation in quality assurance matters through affordances of meaningful engagement.

Child Care Providers' Quality Improvement within QRIS

Do Early Care and Education Programs Improve When Enrolled in Quality Rating and Improvement Systems? Longitudinal Evidence from One System

Structures and systems influencing quality improvement in Australian early childhood education and care centres

Quality Rating and Improvement Systems of Early Childhood Education in America and the Inspirations

Quality Indicators for Family Support Services and Their Relationship to Organizational Social Context

A mixed-methods investigation of early childhood professional development for providers and recipients in the United States

The quest for continuous quality improvement in Australian long day care services: getting the most out of the Assessment and Rating process

Early Childhood Education Participation: A Mixed-Methods Study of Parent and Provider Perceived Barriers and Facilitators

Continuous Quality Improvement Processes in Child Protection: A Systematic Literature Review

Promoting quality in programs for infants and toddlers: Comparing the family child care and center-based teaching workforce

Professionalization and Professionalism: Quality Improvement in Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC)

Current state of quality improvement research across cardiac ICUs: a Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Society (PCICS) survey

The role of digital technologies in supporting quality improvement in Australian early childhood education and care settings

Increasing quality in early care and learning environments

Locally Identified Priorities for Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) During Early Implementation of an Evidence-Based Early Childhood Home Visiting Program

Measuring Quality in Two Early Childhood Education Contexts: Centre-Based Childcare and Four-Year-Old Preschool

Quality Improvement Process in Childcare Facilities: Results of a Qualitative Study

Back to Basics: Developmental Catalysts of Quality Improvement in Early Education and Care

ReImagine: Amulti-Disciplinary Quality Improvement Plan to Work at Top of Scope

Process Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care in Australia: A Systematic Literature Review

Domains of quality in early childhood education and care: A scoping review of the extent and consistency of the literature