The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises.

K. Sluka,Xue-Jun Song,T. Ushida,Perri R. Tutelman,B. Stevens,H. Flor,N. Finnerup,M. Ringkamp,Milton L Cohen,M. Sullivan,D. Carr,F. Keefe,S. Raja,J. Mogil,S. Gibson,Kyle Vader
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001939
IF: 7.926
2020-05-23
Pain
Abstract:The current International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) definition of pain as "An unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage" was recommended by the Subcommittee on Taxonomy and adopted by the IASP Council in 1979. This definition has become accepted widely by health care professionals and researchers in the pain field and adopted by several professional, governmental, and nongovernmental organizations, including the World Health Organization. In recent years, some in the field have reasoned that advances in our understanding of pain warrant a reevaluation of the definition and have proposed modifications. Therefore, in 2018, the IASP formed a 14-member, multinational Presidential Task Force comprising individuals with broad expertise in clinical and basic science related to pain, to evaluate the current definition and accompanying note and recommend whether they should be retained or changed. This review provides a synopsis of the critical concepts, the analysis of comments from the IASP membership and public, and the committee's final recommendations for revisions to the definition and notes, which were discussed over a 2-year period. The task force ultimately recommended that the definition of pain be revised to "An unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with, or resembling that associated with, actual or potential tissue damage," and that the accompanying notes be updated to a bulleted list that included the etymology. The revised definition and notes were unanimously accepted by the IASP Council early this year.
Medicine,Psychology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address whether the current definition of pain by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) needs to be updated. Specifically, as the understanding of pain deepens, some researchers believe that the existing definition no longer fully reflects current scientific knowledge, necessitating a reevaluation and revision. The paper discusses in detail the advantages and disadvantages of the current definition and proposes a revised definition and annotations. ### Background - **Current Definition**: The definition of pain adopted by IASP in 1979 is: "An unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage." - **Context**: This definition has been widely accepted and adopted by healthcare professionals and researchers globally. However, in recent years, some researchers believe that with the progress in understanding pain, this definition needs to be reevaluated. ### Main Issues of the Paper 1. **Advantages of the Current Definition**: - **Multidimensional**: Acknowledges the multidimensional nature of pain, including sensory and emotional aspects. - **Conciseness**: The definition is brief and easy to understand. - **Universality**: Widely accepted and has influenced health policy, research, and clinical care. 2. **Disadvantages of the Current Definition**: - **Neglect of Mind-Body Interaction**: Considered "Cartesian," neglecting the multiple interactions between mind and body. - **Lack of Ethical Dimension**: Fails to adequately address the manifestation of pain in vulnerable groups, such as newborns and the elderly. - **Nonverbal Behavior**: Overemphasizes verbal self-report, neglecting the importance of nonverbal behavior. - **Cognitive and Social Factors**: Fails to fully consider the impact of cognitive and social factors on the pain experience. - **Severity**: The use of the term "unpleasant" may underestimate the severity and suffering of acute or chronic pain. 3. **Revision Suggestions**: - **New Definition**: After extensive discussion and feedback, the task force ultimately recommended revising the pain definition to: "An unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with, or resembling that associated with, actual or potential tissue damage." - **Annotation Update**: The annotation section was updated to a list format, emphasizing the subjectivity of pain, the difference between pain and nociception, and the multifactorial influences on pain. ### Methods - **Multimethod Assessment**: The task force employed various methods, including a modified Delphi survey, monthly web meetings, email discussions, and face-to-face meetings. - **External Consultation**: Opinions were sought from bioethicists, philosophers, and language experts. - **Public Feedback**: Public feedback was solicited through the IASP website, and qualitative content analysis was conducted. ### Results - **Public Feedback**: Received 808 responses from 46 countries, with 41.7% expressing very satisfied or satisfied, and 41.5% expressing dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. - **Revision Suggestions**: Based on the feedback, the task force made further revisions to the definition and annotations, and the final recommended definition and annotations were unanimously approved by the IASP Council. ### Discussion - **Controversial Points**: During the revision process, the task force faced some controversies, such as whether to include social factors and how to describe the subjectivity of pain. The final decisions were based on the majority opinion. ### Conclusion The paper proposes a revised definition and annotations through a reevaluation of the current IASP pain definition, aiming to better reflect the current understanding of pain while maintaining the definition's conciseness and universal applicability.