Pain and suffering: a legal and medical lexicon for the 21st century

Richard M Hirshberg
Abstract:Defining "suffering and pain" from both legal and medical perspectives is essential in understanding how misinterpretations, confusion and misconceptions can occur through "impressions" of events by uninvolved observers of these basic human sensations. Subjective interpretations of an individual's pain/narrative by professionals can lead to collisions in the courtroom and be a cause for clinical ambivalence in the physician's office. The phenomenon of cognitive, affective experiences with acute, chronic, and emotional pain and its association with "suffering" will be discussed. Contemporary experimental results in neuroscience and advances in clinical medical research attempting to explain how varied expressions of pain in man may have evolved, can be more carefully evaluated, and possibly visualized and measured, will be reviewed. The neurobiological impact of empathy and compassion derived from an individual's narrative and self-reporting of pain and suffering upon the psyches of physicians, juries and otherwise dispassionate observers will be discussed. The purpose of this discussion is to emphasize the importance of considering the complexities embodied in any decision-making process, legal or medical, involving the phenomenon of human perceptions and responses to pain. The data discussed are based on a comprehensive search and review of past and current pertinent literature attempting to explain and decipher man's expressions of pain and suffering in its legal, societal, clinical and scientific ramifications.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?