Abstract:Summary Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a promising solution to address the challenges posed by data silos and the need for global data fusion. It offers a distributed machine learning framework with privacy‐preserving features, allowing model training without the need to collect user data. However, FL also presents significant security and privacy threats that hinder its widespread adoption. The requirements of privacy and security in FL are inherently conflicting. Privacy necessitates the concealment of individual client updates, while security requires the disclosure of client updates to detect anomalies. While most existing research focused on the privacy and security aspects of FL, very few studies have addressed the compatibility of these two demands. In this work, we aim to bridge this gap by proposing a comprehensive defense scheme that ensures privacy, security, and compatibility in FL. We categorize the existing literature into two key directions: privacy defense and security defense. Privacy defense includes methods based on additive masks, differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, and trusted execution environment, whereas security defense encompasses distance‐, performance‐, clustering‐, and similarity‐based anomaly detection techniques and statistical information‐based anomaly update bypassing techniques when the server is trusted and privacy‐compatible anomaly update detection techniques when the server is not trusted. In addition, this article presents decentralized FL solutions based on blockchain. For each direction, we discuss specific technical solutions, their advantages, and disadvantages. By evaluating various defense methods, we identify the most suitable approach to address the primary challenge of "achieving a secure and robust FL system against malicious adversaries while protecting users' privacy." We then propose a theoretical reference framework for end‐to‐end protection of privacy and security in FL for the key problem, which summarizes the attack surface of FL systems from the client to the server under the security model where the client and server are malicious. Leveraging the strengths and characteristics of existing schemes, our proposed framework integrates multiple techniques to strike a balance between privacy, usability, and efficiency. This framework serves as a valuable reference and provides insights for future work in the field. Finally, we also provide recommendations for future research directions in this field.

When Federated Learning Meets Privacy-Preserving Computation

Privacy and Robustness in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defenses

Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning Against Label-Flipping Attacks on Non-IID Data

Privacy preserving and secure robust federated learning: A survey

A Comprehensive Survey of Privacy-preserving Federated Learning

Research on the Security Technology of Federated Learning Privacy Preserving

Threats to Federated Learning: A Survey

Federated Learning with Privacy-preserving and Model IP-right-protection

Advancements in Federated Learning: Models, Methods, and Privacy

Federated Learning Attacks and Defenses: A Survey

Federated Learning Privacy: Attacks, Defenses, Applications, and Policy Landscape - A Survey

LF3PFL: A Practical Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning Algorithm Based on Local Federalization Scheme

Performance Analysis and Optimization in Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning

Efficient, Private and Robust Federated Learning

Prevention of GAN-Based Privacy Inferring Attacks Towards Federated Learning.

Privacy Attack in Federated Learning is Not Easy: An Experimental Study

Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning Framework Based on Chained Secure Multiparty Computing

Practical Private Aggregation in Federated Learning Against Inference Attack

FLCP: federated learning framework with communication-efficient and privacy-preserving

Federated Learning with Reduced Information Leakage and Computation

Fedlabx: a Practical and Privacy-Preserving Framework for Federated Learning