Whats in a name? On the rhetorical harm of 'never events

Julia Szymczak
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017395
IF: 7.418
2024-08-18
BMJ Quality & Safety
Abstract:It has been 22 years since the introduction of 'never event' to the discourse surrounding patient safety. Originally coined by then-CEO of the National Quality Forum (NQF) Kenneth Kizer, MD,1 the term refers to errors so egregious that they are intolerable, and thus, should never happen.2 Although interventions and regulatory muscle have been directed at eliminating them, never events continue to occur. Against this backdrop, in this issue of BMJ Quality and Safety , Zaslow and colleagues3 argue that the power of the concept to improve patient safety is undercut because there is no standardised definition and because not all never events are preventable. They call for the development of a consensus-based universal definition and a common list of never events to promote standardisation and improve safety. I am not optimistic that these changes will improve the usefulness of the concept of the never...
health care sciences & services,health policy & services
What problem does this paper attempt to address?