An Overview of Current Acid Fracturing Technology With Recent Implications for Emulsified Acids

Yan Li,R.B. Sullivan,Jean de Rozieres,G.L. Gaz,J.J. Hinkel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/26581-ms
1993-10-03
Abstract:SPE Members Abstract The current acid-reaction testing methods for determining mass transfer and kinetics parameters are reviewed. Published acid fracturing models used in the industry are compared in terms of the basic equations, boundary conditions, solution methods and mass transfer considerations. A sensitivity study (using a surface concentration model) shows the mass transfer coefficient to be the most important parameter which affects the shape of the concentration profile. The current industry standard correlation (Williams-Nierode) for determining the mixing coefficient is compared to laboratory results from history matching to determine the effective mixing coefficient for both Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids. The laboratory results in the domain investigated (Reynolds numbers from 1 to 100) are generally lower than the Williams-Nierode correlation. A quality control procedure for obtaining repeatable results from the rotating disk test is presented. This technique is also applied to power law fluids. An emulsified acid field example is also presented to show the effectiveness of acid fracturing as a viable alternative to proppant fracturing. Introduction Using hydrochloric acid (HC1) as a fracturing fluid has long been considered a theoretically viable technique for stimulating limestone and dolomite formations with high embedment stresses. However, due to the complex dynamic interaction between the chemical reaction and difficulty of proper modeling of hydraulic fracture growth, very little research (compared to proppant fracturing) has been performed recently in this field. Further limitations are encountered by the lack of adequate kinetics data and mass transport properties at in-situ fracturing conditions of viscosity (non-Newtonian fluids at Reynolds numbers of 1 to 100) and temperature. The result was a concept that acid fracturing was not a predictable (and economically successful) technique; this led stimulation research to fracturing treatments using proppant and nonreactive fluids. The effectiveness of an acid fracturing treatment depends on fracture length and conductivity. In turn, the conductivity depends on the fluid loss and the amount of rock dissolved as acid flows through the fracture. Therefore, to predict the stimulation ratio resulting from an acid fracturing treatment, one must first estimate the acid-reaction kinetics. These kinetics depend on the rate of transport of the acid to the surface of the fracture and the rate of acid reaction at the surface. Concept of Reaction Kinetics and Mass Transfer The generalized formula for the HC1-limestone reaction is (1) and for the HC1-dolomite reaction (2) The reaction rate for the chemical reaction between HC1 and a carbonate rock is often represented by the general expression: (3) where Jsr = flux or surface reaction rate, mole/(cm2.s)k = reaction rate parameter, (mole/cm3)(1-n) (cm/s)Cs = surface concentration of the hydronium ions, mole/cm3n = order of the reaction, dimensionless. P. 709^
What problem does this paper attempt to address?