Comprehensive Evaluation of Different TiO2-Based Phosphopeptide Enrichment and Fractionation Methods for Phosphoproteomics

Jiaran Li,Jifeng Wang,Yumeng Yan,Na Li,Xiaoqing Qing,Ailikemu Tuerxun,Xiaojing Guo,Xiulan Chen,Fuquan Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11132047

IF: 6

2022-06-28

Cells

Abstract:Protein phosphorylation is an essential post-translational modification that regulates multiple cellular processes. Due to their low stoichiometry and ionization efficiency, it is critical to efficiently enrich phosphopeptides for phosphoproteomics. Several phosphopeptide enrichment methods have been reported; however, few studies have comprehensively compared different TiO2-based phosphopeptide enrichment methods using complex proteomic samples. Here, we compared four TiO2-based phosphopeptide enrichment methods that used four non-phosphopeptide excluders (glutamic acid, lactic acid, glycolic acid, and DHB). We found that these four TiO2-based phosphopeptide enrichment methods had different enrichment specificities and that phosphopeptides enriched by the four methods had different physicochemical characteristics. More importantly, we discovered that phosphopeptides had a higher deamidation ratio than peptides from cell lysate and that phosphopeptides enriched using the glutamic acid method had a higher deamidation ratio than the other three methods. We then compared two phosphopeptide fractionation methods: ammonia- or TEA-based high pH reversed-phase (HpH-RP). We found that fewer phosphopeptides, especially multi-phosphorylated peptides, were identified using the ammonia-based method than using the TEA-based method. Therefore, the TEA-based HpH-RP fractionation method performed better than the ammonia method. In conclusion, we comprehensively evaluated different TiO2-based phosphopeptide enrichment and fractionation methods, providing a basis for selecting the proper protocols for comprehensive phosphoproteomics.

cell biology