Abstract:The basic arguments for a mental image model of thought are based on neuropsychological evidence. Farah found that the same brain regions are activated during both mental representation and actual perception, while Bishiah found that brain traumas that affected perception, also affected the ability to create mental images. Pylyshyn on the other hand, argues that all mental images are guided by ‘’cognitive penetrability’’, thus on their very basis, are manipulated by certain propositional elements. Given this difficulty, Kargopoulos hinted towards further research, featuring shapes and solid objects, for which subjects have no prior extensive knowledge. This would force subjects to use non-semantic strategies of representation, meaning mental imagery. Hinton’s cube problem conforms to these requirements. Hinton’s problem aligns with the idea that spatial tasks (especially tasks with cubes that change layout) are guided by propositional cues (our knowledge about squares) and supports Pylyshyn’s position. Using one of the simplest objects, a cube, Hinton showed that as soon as this shape changes its mental arrangement in space, even suspicious -as to the nature of the experiment- participants will make mistakes that are not present when they manipulate a mental image of the cube sitting on its typical array [1-5]. Aim: Our goal was to investigate the relationship between spatio-visual skill and the ability for mental partitioning in healthy subjects. Methodology: We used 2 groups (344 participants) a control and an experimental one. In the control group, we presented a Moebius’ strip, in the experimental group, we presented the same Moebius’ strip and asked them to mentally represent it. All participants asked to mentally partition the strip. Results: Of the 344 participants, only 31 managed to give the correct number of vertices in space. Though people had a hard time manipulating the cube’s mental image, their success rates were much higher for the Hinton 1 task in which propositional representation was more accessible. Only 9 of the 344 participants could find the correct answer for the Moebius strip task in which mental manipulation of the strip image was impossible. Conclusions: We come to the conclusion that the relationship between ‘’seeing’’ and ‘’knowing’’ is more complex, not just on the level of the mental image level but also on the level of perception. Our findings bring back to the scientific background the idea that the mind’s selective attention to previous experience and cognitive schemas will decidedly affect human thought

The medium modulates the medusa effect: Perceived mind in analogue and digital images

The Medusa effect reveals levels of mind perception in pictures

Mind in the Machine: Perceived Minds Induce Decision Change

The Medusa effect: a registered replication report of Will, Merritt, Jenkins and Kingstone (2021)

Extracting Social Meaning from a Face: The Neural Substrates and Behavioral Repercussions of Mind Perception

Influence of mental imagery on spatial presence and enjoyment assessed in different types of media

Semantic Differential Scale Method Can Reveal Multi-Dimensional Aspects of Mind Perception

A Robot by Any Other Frame: Framing and Behaviour Influence Mind Perception in Virtual but not Real-World Environments

Seeing the mind of robots: Harm augments mind perception but benevolent intentions reduce dehumanisation of artificial entities in visual vignettes.

More than a body: Mind perception and the nature of objectification.

Mind’s Selective Attention to Previous Experience

Immersive exposure to simulated visual hallucinations modulates high-level human cognition

Digital visions: the experience of self and others in the age of the digital revolution

The Effect of Image Features on Judgments of Homophily, Credibility, and Intention to Use as Avatars in Future Interactions

Mental Imagery Induces Cross-Modal Sensory Plasticity and Changes Future Auditory Perception

Using Virtual Humans to Understand Real Ones

Does it kill the imagination dead? The effect of film versus reading on mental imagery.

Subjective signal strength distinguishes reality from imagination

IMAGINE: An Integrated Model of Artificial Intelligence-Mediated Communication Effects

Blending into the Crowd: Electrophysiological Evidence of Gestalt Perception of a Human Dyad

Surrealism Me: Interactive Virtual Embodying Experiences in Mixed Reality