A sequential guide to identify neonates with low bacterial meningitis risk: a multicenter study

Yan Chen,Zhanghua Yin,Xiaohui Gong,Jing Li,Wenhua Zhong,Liqin Shan,Xiaoping Lei,Qian Zhang,Qin Zhou,Youyan Zhao,Chao Chen,Yongjun Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51356
IF: 5.43
2021-04-09
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Objective</h3><p>To derive and validate a predictive algorithm integrating clinical and laboratory parameters to stratify a full‐term neonate's risk level of having bacterial meningitis (BM).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>A multicentered dataset was categorized into derivation (689 full‐term neonates aged ≤28 days with a lumbar puncture [LP]) and external validation (383 neonates) datasets. A sequential algorithm with risk stratification for neonatal BM was constructed.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>In the derivation dataset, 102 neonates had BM (14.8%). Using stepwise regression analysis, fever, infection source absence, neurological manifestation, C‐reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin were selected as optimal predictive sets for neonatal BM and introduced to a sequential algorithm. Based on the algorithm, 96.1% of BM cases (98 of 102) were identified, and 50.7% of the neonates (349 of 689) were classified as low risk. The algorithm's sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) in identifying neonates at low risk of BM were 96.2% (95% CI 91.7%–98.9%) and 98.9% (95% CI 97.6%–99.6%), respectively. In the validation dataset, sensitivity and NPV were 95.9% (95% CI 91.0%–100%) and 98.8% (95% CI 97.7%–100%).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Interpretation</h3><p>The sequential algorithm can risk stratify neonates for BM with excellent predictive performance and prove helpful to clinicians in LP‐related decision‐making.</p></section>
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?